Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered-07

Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net> Sun, 12 March 2017 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <morrowc@ops-netman.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72DAF129416; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 11:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kce6C14YoU09; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 11:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.kvm02.ops-netman.net (relay.kvm02.ops-netman.net [IPv6:2606:700:e:550:5c82:28ff:fe25:4960]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A1B3129406; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 11:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.ops-netman.net (mailserver.ops-netman.net [199.168.90.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay.kvm02.ops-netman.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A80C3FCF7; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 18:28:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from morrowc.roam.corp.google.com.ops-netman.net (static-96-241-182-39.washdc.fios.verizon.net [96.241.182.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ops-netman.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D869A5AC3A1A; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 18:28:51 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 14:28:51 -0400
Message-ID: <yj9ok27upcws.wl%morrowc@ops-netman.net>
From: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>
To: Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net>
In-Reply-To: <20170311222527.324125ACF21@minas-ithil.hactrn.net>
References: <5821A5CF-EFF8-4CE3-9AA4-CFDB9C903D63@cisco.com> <20170311222527.324125ACF21@minas-ithil.hactrn.net>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/24.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Organization: Operations Network Management, Ltd.
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/ksATrF3_6Y1YrKAnVyO4fwCHnHk>
Cc: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, "sidr-chairs@ietf.org" <sidr-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered@ietf.org>, "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered-07
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 18:28:55 -0000

At Sat, 11 Mar 2017 17:25:27 -0500,
Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net> wrote:
> 
> At Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:44:58 +0000, Alvaro Retana (aretana) wrote:
> > 
> > I just finished reading this document.  My review is predicated on
> > the assumption that the intent of the WG is to define an additional
> > validation process, and not amend/change/update/deprecate the
> > existing one?yet, which is why there are not only process changes
> > specified, but also new OIDs.
> 
> Alvaro,
> 
> I will let the WG chairs and authors speak to intent regarding the
> existing validation process.
> 

I think the intent of the WG is still to add the new validation
process, then deprecate the original once all users are on code which
supports the 'new' way.

-chris