Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz
Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> Wed, 26 October 2016 15:35 UTC
Return-Path: <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809A6129625; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:35:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id niWXwz2Ee7SS; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:35:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x234.google.com (mail-qk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A8961294C7; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:35:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id v138so8950676qka.5; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:35:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=Hq7ACGXa6XUWfsu3Quj5W4Sy4auX8bKHxEqCiotQO3Y=; b=z/YAICCkPpYBrpvY20eh9YalqecuuoRzRVKS1JCBTrofUSaaaPWMRZcJ+KPCp73HdW ZoWOld8gEG/e71fc8NX9TN2wBcKyDBiNE9RvAjY1LtDGZsnB/rsMKj5IuzP5GqpjNLRR 9QtfZkySc8xl7av444OdoPZ/muhbyqlzfXBYHOdvTh+fK44rRfPBosSqp0UbmDerC3p7 b4at/LEBAs0/luNVHMQBz1J2swbVXZ3uFQ3sV7ppNvsvkYew004o+QgBeFJYOb87A+rj o9U3wJaj2kcU5BLgjNSvm4v6XqS52vZvZlksaqF2N1J2SzYDUC4pywwWu5HoOOuyyvr9 RVlg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Hq7ACGXa6XUWfsu3Quj5W4Sy4auX8bKHxEqCiotQO3Y=; b=Uk1I2iVBlUyRFKeHjoaT2053j9hRD1aYCnEMP04OypJvsw5J6B6tJAYNQ84MvsMZzO GDmOHSbiQHco5E9tmzVHxfMksTmLbcpX3kfV0QRIM+cvBWLoTd7ZV1NF/AqY5s2OyAb0 ZcTk9cr9eBhp9/+vuORfgo6R3OihzNDpZf9wfUX8YZzDbcIXsAZZZDmx5kKRIBcNUEP7 DRhz0z+IFDT7Ura3H9JdfKcRMot+RQY5n0hfXTiSROpxo0DdbMJXu+IIARwRNoiQ9Vg2 30UcnNIu7QkzMAVDzIqwD1JQF1ae2SjXZVcP8zjFSNQOrnVGT1XfcAbAWcyTE72jCJ0D SOmQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvcp3Siq/VAqYlfyRJ6tjQ6PpltVI6crS4HYAxccaAJ1YA/zJ2KF4qP5GkwbLTvOP0e1CXwfXrVIzV1vZA==
X-Received: by 10.55.129.6 with SMTP id c6mr2576734qkd.4.1477496125199; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:35:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: christopher.morrow@gmail.com
Received: by 10.140.105.244 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:35:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <yj9ooa46aumt.wl%morrowc@ops-netman.net>
References: <yj9ooa46aumt.wl%morrowc@ops-netman.net>
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:35:24 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: C823bDtoUVsI91ywKmHUKA66HtY
Message-ID: <CAL9jLab3Sv6K5tmbERvFg8AzDdvPJ8Qtv_v++kn_vJd_bgbUmA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c05cd80b32442053fc65f24"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/lKQVPHWjYe0UGIisH1Mz3IRcITk>
Cc: sidr-ads@ietf.org, "sidr-chairs@ietf.org" <sidr-chairs@ietf.org>, "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 15:35:30 -0000
Restarting this thread, with some updates :) Preparing for Seoul in a few weeks time, with the intent that we do not meet face-to-face in Chicago, have all current 'protocol' related docs to the IESG/done and meet instead in sidr-ops if there are agenda items at that time :) Currently we have the following in IESG/pub-request status (13 documents): draft-ietf-sidr-adverse-actions draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-overview draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling draft-ietf-sidr-publication draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-rfc6810-bis draft-ietf-sidr-delta-protocol (10/26 sent forward) draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered (10/26 sent forward) Currently still active documents (8 documents): draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-rollover draft-ietf-sidr-lta-use-cases draft-ietf-sidr-route-server-rpki-light draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-tree-validation draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered draft-ietf-sidr-rtr-keying draft-ietf-sidr-slurm (this reflects the changes since the last email, included below) I believe we're still planning to move (and have agreement from authors): draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-rollover draft-ietf-sidr-lta-use-cases draft-ietf-sidr-route-server-rpki-light draft-ietf-sidr-rtr-keying which leaves to be dealt with by Chicago 2 documents: draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-tree-validation draft-ietf-sidr-slurm I think this is good, I believe (and of course I should be corrected if wrong) slurm - more work inbound and discussion planned in Seoul tree-validation - I thought moved to sidr-ops, but don't have docs to back that up. -chris On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net> wrote: > > Howdy SIDR peeps, > (+bonus ops ad) > > Following on the Berlin meeting we were trying to accomplish two > things: > > 1) get all documents related to sidr protocols into wglc and then > publication > > 2) get all documents which are more operationally focused moved > along to an ops group (sidr-ops or something akin to that) > > With that in mind there are 8 documents in the publication queue: > draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration > draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs > draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops > draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-overview > draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles > draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol > draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling > draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-rfc6810-bis > > and 11 still in progress. Of the 11 left Sandy and I think they > roughly break down like: > > Documents which should move to the ops group: > draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-rollover > draft-ietf-sidr-lta-use-cases > draft-ietf-sidr-route-server-rpki-light - authors notified/queried > about this > draft-ietf-sidr-rtr-keying > > documents which should finish out in sidr: > draft-ietf-sidr-delta-protocol > draft-ietf-sidr-publication > draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup - pub request in flight > draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-tree-validation > draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered > draft-ietf-sidr-slurm - authors recently updated > draft-ietf-sidr-adverse-actions - wglc imminent > > I think if there's no meaningful discussion on change for these > between now and 9/16/2016 (Sept 16th) we will assume this list is > correct. For documents in the 'move' list, if progress to publication > happens 'good!'. For all documents in the 'stays' list: > 1) we aim to have wglc by Seoul > 2) publication requests started on as many as possible > > We plan to meet in Seoul, but not in Chicago (Mar 2017) where we > expect the ops group to exist and meet. We can progress documents in > SIDR after Seoul, but the WG should close out shortly after the new > year. (or that's the goal). > > Thoughts? > -chris > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > sidr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr >
- [sidr] Current document status && directionz Chris Morrow
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz joel jaeggli
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Carlos M. Martinez
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Carlos M. Martinez
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Chris Morrow
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Chris Morrow
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Stephen Kent
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Roque Gagliano (rogaglia)
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Rob Austein
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Rob Austein
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Andrew de la Haye
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Rob Austein
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Roque Gagliano (rogaglia)
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Roque Gagliano (rogaglia)
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Heasley
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz David Conrad
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz David Conrad
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Sandra Murphy
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Tim Bruijnzeels
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Declan Ma
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz Randy Bush