Re: [sidr] two stranded docuemnts - stake time

Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> Thu, 21 July 2016 16:37 UTC

Return-Path: <sandy@tislabs.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8607F12D79C; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 09:37:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.188
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.188 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9PR_bFNuxm53; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 09:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from walnut.tislabs.com (walnut.tislabs.com [192.94.214.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B7F512D65E; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 09:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nova.tislabs.com (unknown [10.66.1.77]) by walnut.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B3AC28B0046; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:37:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by nova.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D907E1F8055; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:37:29 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DE3B0F97-3F78-4D63-9B5F-A6646F6145FA"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <87E65996-2ACD-4A3A-8D20-1C7911CBBB72@tislabs.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:37:27 -0400
Message-Id: <BB7C0754-68B9-495E-8A0A-C66BF002EFB7@tislabs.com>
References: <yj9oinvzi8gj.wl%morrowc@ops-netman.net> <87E65996-2ACD-4A3A-8D20-1C7911CBBB72@tislabs.com>
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/lkei52Om8wlt4nh6BU6Yeiigfj4>
Cc: sidr-ads@ietf.org, sidr <sidr@ietf.org>, sidr-chairs@ietf.org, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
Subject: Re: [sidr] two stranded docuemnts - stake time
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:37:37 -0000

> On Jul 21, 2016, at 11:59 AM, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Jul 21, 2016, at 6:36 AM, Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> We are going to officially stake:
>> 1)     draft-ietf-sidr-slurm
> 
> Hasn’t had energy in a while, but not so long that I can say there’s no possibility of resurrection.  (e.g., keyroll had a two year gap in there.  But then the need was clear.)
> 
> 
>> 2)     draft-ietf-sidr-lta-use-cases
>> 
>> These are not being progressed currently, and won't be in the future
>> it seems. We'll do the process bits next week to remove them from
>> SIDR's work queue.
> 
> I’d like to hear from the authors (we’ve heard from Randy) whether they have a possibility of continuing.
> 
> And I’d think the wg has to declare there’s no interest - if there’s a reason, and a new author volunteers…

Chris, I suppose that’s what you meant by “the process bits”

—Sandy

> 
> —Sandy
> 
>> 
>> -chris
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr