Re: [sidr] draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Sat, 07 January 2017 01:32 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328E11296D8 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 17:32:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MZUNWxax77Tq for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 17:32:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4059F1297BC for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 17:32:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1cPfrs-0003yX-M5; Sat, 07 Jan 2017 01:32:24 +0000
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2017 10:32:22 +0900
Message-ID: <m2lgunr6xl.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <6C8E073D-F1AB-4588-8DFF-FAA0A2465273@cisco.com>
References: <B3E00907-BF7C-400D-8A5B-4F02BA2A2C12@arrcus.com> <C3B0482B-1007-4B29-B178-DE98C062E197@arrcus.com> <DM2PR09MB0446573C5C4C482D62700B6884630@DM2PR09MB0446.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <6C8E073D-F1AB-4588-8DFF-FAA0A2465273@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/24.5 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/llW7wJjHHrNrRGokBOSIdKi8OGQ>
Cc: Kotikalapudi Sriram <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>, Matthew Lepinski <mlepinski@ncf.edu>, sidr <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2017 01:32:30 -0000

re keyur's point 4.  the issue is that 4271 has semantics of AS_PATH,
bgpsec replaces it with BGPSEC_PATH, but bgpsec does not explicitly
repeat things such as loop detection using BGPSEC_PATH.  instead of this
becoming another text explosion, a simple statement that, in bgpsec, the
following AS_PATH semantics of 4271: <list>, hold analogously for
BGPSEC_PATH.

randy