Re: [sidr] Confederations and Private ASNs (WAS: AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-18)

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Tue, 20 December 2016 23:37 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79CF21293F5; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:37:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.622
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.622 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ESybJyJt2EXc; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:37:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D49C12711D; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:37:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=450; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1482277049; x=1483486649; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=GX9xjh5Xatwqr9mPaVgHb/OincaMhavm5cTmiF+X5xc=; b=L4IIBW6xbnAvs1p6Ni8XQznOzOAWwqXg7yqoIQsz1c9tmIESC/IKWWpb 8Y/6+cG/Gg5u3NS+gwyRLXXvsdKpJ5PYTF4nEmJekwl3b2pPxcMC1gwYR RrscUDQ202DyT5VHP9USKypCGETw4ps5Bctsm4cwTA0AVfWUcmmFMWsp2 s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AbAQA8wFlY/5FdJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgzcBAQEBAR+BYI1QllqVDoIKhiICgWo/FAECAQEBAQEBAWIohGgBAQEDARIoPwULAgEIGB4QMiUCBA4FGweIQQiaCQGQHosRAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHYY2gX0IglSEQIMxgjABBJUDhW0BkTOBXY5wjhqEDgEfN4EmLA8BhAWBRXKJBwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,380,1477958400"; d="scan'208";a="183848306"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Dec 2016 23:37:28 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uBKNbSvA014722 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 20 Dec 2016 23:37:28 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 17:37:27 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 17:37:27 -0600
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: "Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>
Thread-Topic: Confederations and Private ASNs (WAS: AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-18)
Thread-Index: AQHSUmenE2EHhTbiU0q7IXrD4ZYx2aEF0Iz4gAN2lwCACDChKIAAF3mv
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 23:37:27 +0000
Message-ID: <A876C8E0-7391-4A40-A8A3-E956F57D00F0@cisco.com>
References: <7055D209-5BF7-4B5D-A675-356CD2CBFF4D@cisco.com> <DM2PR09MB04460DC9A23E1F58AEE629BF849B0@DM2PR09MB0446.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>, <98186E08-8CAC-4EB0-9E84-BBABACC43678@cisco.com>, <DM2PR09MB044634DCE6C5D55112DDEF6384900@DM2PR09MB0446.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM2PR09MB044634DCE6C5D55112DDEF6384900@DM2PR09MB0446.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/mR1ZlfniN0AnGFpfZf8WscmX6xk>
Cc: "draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol@ietf.org>, "sidr-chairs@ietf.org" <sidr-chairs@ietf.org>, Matthias Waehlisch <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de>, "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Confederations and Private ASNs (WAS: AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-18)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 23:37:30 -0000

Hi!

I am (obviously) fine with it.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

Thumb-typed and autocorrected..

> On Dec 20, 2016, at 5:56 PM, Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov> wrote:
> 
> If we agree and others on the WG list express no objection or find no fault in this solution, I will be happy to go ahead and add this solution for the confederation case (it requires just a couple of sentences to be added the spec).