Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2?

Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> Fri, 01 April 2011 11:39 UTC

Return-Path: <jared@puck.nether.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 887E83A6836 for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 04:39:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.561
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.561 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0VMXi9lDSK19 for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 04:39:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from puck.nether.net (puck.nether.net [IPv6:2001:418:3f4::5]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 729DA3A6834 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 04:39:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.137] (173-167-0-106-michigan.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.167.0.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by puck.nether.net (8.14.4/8.12.9) with ESMTP id p31BfSpT016940 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 1 Apr 2011 07:41:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jared@puck.nether.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <m2d3l6cj2l.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 07:41:28 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <BBE04845-995C-4DEF-9D23-9F4654F3375C@puck.nether.net>
References: <AANLkTimq3hcdK7-f_Pa9sWJJOTzF_GBLcYu36sB3WszN@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikfn_ZRQNQx0QLV7fJa8DDeqMa=yRqWUH4krMHD@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinV88U3cF6z51eNtPeF-xKG1aWVgALd06CPq4kE@mail.gmail.com> <m2d3l6cj2l.wl%randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (puck.nether.net [204.42.254.5]); Fri, 01 Apr 2011 07:41:29 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>, sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2?
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:39:53 -0000

On Apr 1, 2011, at 7:22 AM, Randy Bush wrote:

> i propose that i rev the doc to say
>  o the transport must provide authentication and integrity
>  o the current ssh description is an example
>  o other transport meeting the authentication and integrity constraints
>    are welcome

This sounds acceptable to me.

- Jared

> of course, this will leave open the mandatory-to-implement LCD issue.
> sigh.