Re: [sidr] wglc for draft-ietf-sidr-adverse-actions-00

Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Fri, 01 July 2016 14:54 UTC

Return-Path: <kent@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 594E812D66C for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 07:54:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FSL_HELO_HOME=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fCO8kwpVvx3c for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 07:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bos-mailout2.raytheon.com (bos-mailout2.raytheon.com [199.46.198.208]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2470912B061 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 07:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ma-mailout1.directory.ray.com (ma-mailout1.directory.ray.com [147.25.130.100]) by bos-mailout2.raytheon.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id u61EsGWg012465 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 14:54:17 GMT
Received: from smtp.bbn.com ([128.33.0.80]) by ma-mailout1.directory.ray.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id u61EsG2Y004631 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA(256 bits) verified NO) sender kent@bbn.com for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 14:54:16 GMT
Received: from ssh.bbn.com ([192.1.122.15]:60885 helo=COMSEC.fios-router.home) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <kent@bbn.com>) id 1bIzpf-000JN2-TJ for sidr@ietf.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 10:54:15 -0400
To: sidr@ietf.org
References: <8E32FD39-FD20-455C-8BEC-5752DE9C8531@tislabs.com> <m2wpl6ffdp.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Message-ID: <8196148a-b98d-c680-c714-55498131e7ce@bbn.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 10:54:17 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <m2wpl6ffdp.wl%randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-07-01_04:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=43 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1604210000 definitions=main-1607010147
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/npYOXAQYfSUrHMwoKBxzDFiFaYQ>
Subject: Re: [sidr] wglc for draft-ietf-sidr-adverse-actions-00
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 14:54:24 -0000

Randy,

I presume you are referring to the text that describes ROA competition, 
although you didn't cite specific text in your message (too much typing?).

I'll revise that text to note the case of a resource transfer appears to 
be competition, absent any additional info labeling it as such. That's a 
good reason to adopt the TAO record that we proposed long ago, as part 
of a well-documented description of how to effect transfers. There are 5 
places where the word "competition" appears later in the document. I'll 
review these and see if I think any of them need to revised in light of 
your comment.

Steve