Return-Path: <oleg@ripe.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DBBA12D8D2;
 Fri,  8 Jul 2016 16:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.326
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426]
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id F1MJpGOdq27z; Fri,  8 Jul 2016 16:04:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from molamola.ripe.net (molamola.ripe.net
 [IPv6:2001:67c:2e8:11::c100:1371])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 525B712D7EF;
 Fri,  8 Jul 2016 16:04:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from titi.ripe.net ([193.0.23.11])
 by molamola.ripe.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <oleg@ripe.net>)
 id 1bLepK-0001kN-C4; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 01:04:55 +0200
Received: from dog.ripe.net ([193.0.1.217] helo=[IPv6:::1])
 by titi.ripe.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72)
 (envelope-from <oleg@ripe.net>)
 id 1bLepJ-0005Em-4r; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 01:04:53 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Oleg Muravskiy <oleg@ripe.net>
In-Reply-To: <20160708225123.32075.21604.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2016 01:04:52 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <100F7109-D601-478A-959D-7260AC21A31A@ripe.net>
References: <20160708225123.32075.21604.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: internet-drafts@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
X-ACL-Warn: Delaying message
X-RIPE-Spam-Level: ----------
X-RIPE-Spam-Report: Spam Total Points:   -10.7 points
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- ------------------------------------
 -7.5 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 -1.3 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 [score: 0.0000]
X-RIPE-Signature: c408758d4ce2e8eb06762a65a3365b74edf8ea5ddad4c9bfeb490374f2683c87
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/qGDTH4OH2dThmWjVAjGxLus-Lq8>
Cc: sidr@ietf.org, i-d-announce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-tree-validation-01.txt
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>,
 <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>,
 <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 23:04:59 -0000

This is an update to the draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-tree-validation.

No major changes, mostly clarifications that address comments from Steve =
Kent, and additional information as requested at the previous WG =
session.  Hope this version is more clear and close to final.


Oleg


> On 09 Jul 2016, at 00:51, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>=20
>=20
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts =
directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Secure Inter-Domain Routing of the =
IETF.
>=20
>        Title           : RPKI Certificate Tree Validation by a Relying =
Party Tool
>        Authors         : Oleg Muravskiy
>                          Tim Bruijnzeels
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-tree-validation-01.txt
> 	Pages           : 12
> 	Date            : 2016-07-08
>=20
> Abstract:
>   This document describes the approach to validate the content of the
>   RPKI certificate tree, as used by the RIPE NCC RPKI Validator.  This
>   approach is independent of a particular object retrieval mechanism.
>   This allows it to be used with repositories available over the rsync
>   protocol, the RPKI Repository Delta Protocol, and repositories that
>   use a mix of both.
>=20
>   This algorithm does not rely on content of repository directories,
>   but uses the Authority Key Identifier (AKI) field of a manifest and =
a
>   certificate revocation list (CRL) objects to discover manifest and
>   CRL objects issued by a particular Certificate Authority (CA).  It
>   further uses the hashes of manifest entries to discover other =
objects
>   issued by the CA.
>=20
>=20
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-tree-validation/
>=20
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-tree-validation-01
>=20
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> =
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-sidr-rpki-tree-validation-0=
1
>=20
>=20
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of =
submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>=20
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>=20

