Re: [sidr] Follow-up on June 6 Interim : Confederations
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Fri, 15 June 2012 21:43 UTC
Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E59B11E80F7 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:43:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.566
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.566 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1E9pl+4dUexj for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:43:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05CBE11E80F5 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:43:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rair.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1SfeIO-000ILy-No; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:43:09 +0000
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:43:07 +0900
Message-ID: <m28vfoqmj8.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: "Sriram, Kotikalapudi" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>
In-Reply-To: <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C4930B9BA8404E@MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov>
References: <4FDB8840.2030903@bbn.com> <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C4930B9BA8404E@MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Follow-up on June 6 Interim : Confederations
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:43:12 -0000
> This solution for confeds *requires* each AS within a confed to sign internally > (i.e., from AS to AS within the confed). It does not allow the choice to > a confed operator to sign or not sign the updates internally. > For instance, the operator may be satisfied with the level of mutual trust > within the confed, and therefore may choose to not sign updates internally. > > Do we want to provision this choice into the protocol? sure, if they strip bgpsec and reconstruct the as-path. in bgpsec, all ass sign. end. randy
- [sidr] Follow-up on June 6 Interim : Confederatio… Matt Lepinski
- Re: [sidr] Follow-up on June 6 Interim : Confeder… Sriram, Kotikalapudi
- Re: [sidr] Follow-up on June 6 Interim : Confeder… Matt Lepinski
- Re: [sidr] Follow-up on June 6 Interim : Confeder… Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] Follow-up on June 6 Interim : Confeder… Sriram, Kotikalapudi
- Re: [sidr] Follow-up on June 6 Interim : Confeder… Randy Bush