Re: [sidr] wg adoption call for draft-tbruijnzeels-sidr-validation-local-cache-02

Hi Sandy,

Technical question. We plan to submit an update before the cut-off date - no major overhaul but we have some changes.

Can we just submit a new version as an official document, or should we just re-submit this one, and do the update in a week or two?

Thanks
Tim

> On 03 Mar 2016, at 19:20, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> wrote:
> 
> The responses stream ended quickly, but there were enough to call wg support for adoption.
> 
> Authors, please do submit as an official sidr wg document.
> 
> —Sandy, speaking as one of the co-chairs
> 
> 
> On Dec 9, 2015, at 6:08 PM, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> wrote:
> 
>> As noted in the minutes, the authors of draft-tbruijnzeels-sidr-validation-local-cache-02 request that the working group adopt this work as a wg work item.
>> 
>> A working group adoption poll starts now and will end 14 days from now on 23 December.
>> 
>> Please respond on the list to say whether you support adoption of this work as a working group work item AND whether you will participate in the discussion.
>> 
>> Remember that working group consensus to adopt the work needs responses, not just absence of objection, so speak up.
>> 
>> --Sandy, speaking as one of the wg co-chairs
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr