IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-10

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Sun, 11 December 2016 22:16 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB3AD1294E5 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 14:16:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.796
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.796 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rDlCBZ-B7OLj for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 14:16:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 388811293EB for <sidr@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 14:16:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mb-3.local (c-73-202-177-209.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.202.177.209]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id uBBMG2a2047249 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 11 Dec 2016 22:16:05 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: nagasaki.bogus.com: Host c-73-202-177-209.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.202.177.209] claimed to be mb-3.local
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Alvaro Retana <aretana@cisco.com>
References: <1FBAD3F8-5387-47A3-9988-A49A3133490A@cisco.com> <m2d1ha2ul2.wl-randy@psg.com> <C7A005B5-7550-4B74-8C80-C32C60093CD9@cisco.com> <m21sxkwozs.wl-randy@psg.com> <m2y3zra1ns.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Message-ID: <167fc1b5-50b9-a240-afb7-080ab97f1805@bogus.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 14:15:58 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:50.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/50.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <m2y3zra1ns.wl-randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="654232nt0hufwvaVXEqsM1qXmj0x1lRI6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/rC1uWZR_q7ePtHUCEKghnGvMFYQ>
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-10
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 22:16:10 -0000

On 12/7/16 1:07 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> otoh, private AS numbers are used in non-confed topologies, e.g. the bgp
> stub customer who uses a private AS.  they should not sign of course.
> but once i receive their announcement and strip the private AS,
> can/should i sign?  i just looked at bgpsec-protocol and found no
> guidance.

from that vantage point you are the origin. it's not clear to me that a
customer  relationship is substantively then if you do this internal to
your org. operationally the'yre probably also registering route objects,
issuing LOAS and operating on behalf of the private ASN.

> randy
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status