Re: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops

Eric Osterweil <eosterweil@verisign.com> Mon, 14 November 2011 06:12 UTC

Return-Path: <eosterweil@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9842F11E80AB for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:12:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.575
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.575 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SP50FEs-NO7g for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:12:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod6og108.obsmtp.com (exprod6og108.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.21]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937DB11E80A6 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:12:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from peregrine.verisign.com ([216.168.239.74]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob108.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTsCxMFa3UHUCqcZ4VZCgcfFUO2Fg+N33@postini.com; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:12:01 PST
Received: from dul1wnexcn01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (dul1wnexcn01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.170.12.138]) by peregrine.verisign.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id pAE6C0mC028697 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 01:12:00 -0500
Received: from dul1eosterwe-m1.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([10.100.0.69]) by dul1wnexcn01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 14 Nov 2011 01:11:59 -0500
From: Eric Osterweil <eosterweil@verisign.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:11:57 +0800
Message-Id: <2FCD590E-4AFD-44E3-BD67-2563C35CB565@verisign.com>
To: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Nov 2011 06:11:59.0990 (UTC) FILETIME=[51E7B160:01CCA294]
Subject: Re: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 06:12:02 -0000

One other minor comment/question about this draft:
The term ``Matched'' is defined, and only used once in combination with covered.  Considering that the document seems to (rightly) try to remain decoupled/agnostic of the system design of the RPKI, is this distinction important enought to keep?  The benefit to dropping it would just be less terminiology and might help readability.

Thanks,

Eric