IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12: (with COMMENT)

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Tue, 03 January 2017 15:20 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD4C12961E; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 07:20:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.621
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.621 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XBE9b7ZaYlOq; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 07:20:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 745AC129616; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 07:20:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5426; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1483456852; x=1484666452; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=gKGIOYP/gIVKQyoAMUfwPLdfN40MI/7GGQfeyEp5PjA=; b=ES3pLJ9jaaBAErOBL5et0+uOKURawoijXbXfkaBLGNkfjAHq1JN7hU2v ANpa98i5zHCOPiFwdM/kRMLr4NKEj7V6oqcoYtgGR3BJmjjt2zP1oq3Dk D8BoweDgIgYugay0XrtdZ3IpyI/MI4caAafSWeRr4VjMmFeAZSEEMWfR5 Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A9AQDMv2tY/4ENJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgnFGAQEBAQEfX4EMB41QpDlQgkmCD4IIhiICGoEtPxQBAgEBAQEBAQFiKIRpBiNWEAIBCD8DAgICMBQGCwIEAQ0FiHCvEYIlK4oXAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHYZFggKCX4dKLYIwBZUJhXQBkT2QVZI8AR84gSo8AYQIgUZyhzGBDQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,455,1477958400"; d="scan'208,217";a="189742947"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 03 Jan 2017 15:20:51 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (xch-rcd-001.cisco.com [173.37.102.11]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v03FKpji002123 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 3 Jan 2017 15:20:51 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 09:20:50 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 09:20:50 -0600
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>
Thread-Topic: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHSZPxE+x5HO3zeTEq/vZ3Txn1KiqEll4IAgAAEdgCAABnegIAAl1KAgAARYgCAAJIvAA==
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 15:20:50 +0000
Message-ID: <9A40617C-EB4E-40FD-A8D2-65C292BAC08A@cisco.com>
References: <148336377615.21819.15119186800162780376.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <m2vatxmv83.wl-randy@psg.com> <563AAA29-82F7-4202-8A54-855CD7702595@kuehlewind.net> <m2tw9hmq76.wl-randy@psg.com> <yj9o60lx6kvm.wl%morrowc@ops-netman.net> <m2shp0nct9.wl-randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2shp0nct9.wl-randy@psg.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1d.0.161209
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.117.15.4]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9A40617CEB4E40FDA8D265C292BAC08Aciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/rxMFJ5UrPiBltq8bqKfJx8z6hLk>
Cc: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 15:20:54 -0000

Hi!

I don’t think there’s anything to be done, besides the guidance already in the draft about path preference: prefer Valid paths.  If the validity state changes later, then it becomes a local policy to use or not.

Alvaro.

On 1/2/17, 8:37 PM, "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com<mailto:randy@psg.com>> wrote:

it is not clear to me that this is a space where the ops doc can help
much.  i am open to ideas.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email