IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered - ends 10/25/2016

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Mon, 31 October 2016 19:06 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03430129A40 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 12:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wdZEDEP0_vwJ for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 12:06:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x230.google.com (mail-qk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFD8A129A3F for <sidr@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 12:06:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x230.google.com with SMTP id v138so83209811qka.0 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 12:06:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=aPPb0N93sFnC7kzcNRftV5megR9UVE1JQhKdW192e5c=; b=mOmMXOWTPFXMe0T2jFtZ6BfnQPZdxLFeRiF8zvyov5JjO4MJ64IZO+k+324xq81eXK 26I3PWQtYJBWfUkY1epX7NZXRKSyeIoXN880vi1eAGc4HbhSg5LvI22bRCN1+x5LyKIg n48jSYtDZ/3hCFTrNCL+35xcnBE68M4TTdTiY=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=aPPb0N93sFnC7kzcNRftV5megR9UVE1JQhKdW192e5c=; b=FvlRB/vrIGqSA1jhehXue8wHE9NwQzuwDCbvb2/8MpcxVXz7T0yaE92r9pWq52COYm ElgGI5BTQ2iZq3aE4VWsG9nGfmdxKB3MEH2xhY8ErBnagO3kqxrJl6xuvhBXQx086JWF d10vglx9LUpiam7S/cfgNVi9kUCNIRXIRv29WtPmbIpOjq1ZOQa7BxQNiICyQslExrjn qXUfES8PPNxEXNLFa/NzPhp4m7g6QNpnPjDQ5d/lbG2i/B+U/N/ynr6LN12wGDu4j7+s SP2B/2JxI8Cjrf9cRnFKvfxRS/BsnvRlm2cBeY8LiACBIp8dYcAwwCZ57peG8r19WdMm xhrw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngve1lEKExswjEFsgGpluXgCH2/UOtY5nMkoMN4rIZongfJ4wL50BG3BPaUNrJ3DvDQ==
X-Received: by 10.55.197.72 with SMTP id p69mr25040513qki.241.1477940806469; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 12:06:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.0.92] ([96.231.230.70]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n128sm13884057qka.49.2016.10.31.12.06.45 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 31 Oct 2016 12:06:45 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <8E2E93F5-6184-4E58-8EF8-65C5D43E54A2@ripe.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 15:06:43 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FE412537-7A83-4EF0-BE12-BEA57A17AB0C@sn3rd.com>
References: <yj9otwcjnfkl.wl%morrowc@ops-netman.net> <DM2PR09MB0446D5E5310327B1766D6D4384AB0@DM2PR09MB0446.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <8E2E93F5-6184-4E58-8EF8-65C5D43E54A2@ripe.net>
To: Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@ripe.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/spTJF-Jdl3A8t6FV8pyX4V_JZzw>
Cc: "sidr-ads@ietf.org" <sidr-ads@ietf.org>, Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, "sidr-chairs@ietf.org" <sidr-chairs@ietf.org>, "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered - ends 10/25/2016
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 19:06:51 -0000

I didn’t compile it, but it looks right to me.  And for what it’s worth, you did exactly what I would have done by copying the syntax into the mainbody in order to explain it, but imposing it directly from 3779/6268 in the module.

spt

> On Oct 26, 2016, at 11:32, Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@ripe.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi Sean, Tom, Russ, and all,
> 
> Sorry for bringing this up late. Technically past 25 October, and yes I would like to see this go through as you might expect from an author...
> 
> That said, can someone with good ASN.1-fu please have look at the changes w.r.t. ASN.1 structure and OIDs? I tried to include all your comments properly - but I would feel safer if one of you could confirm.
> 
> Thanks
> Tim
> 
> 
>> On 26 Oct 2016, at 05:13, Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov> wrote:
>> 
>> I read the draft once again. I support publication.
>> 
>> Found a minor typo in the last paragraph on p.15 (can be dealt with during RFC editor review process):
>> s/the loss of on IP address prefix from the VRS-IP/the loss of one IP address prefix from the VRS-IP/
>> 
>> Sriram
>> 
>> ________________________________________
>> From: sidr <sidr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 10:08 AM
>> To: sidr@ietf.org; sidr-chairs@ietf.org; sidr-ads@ietf.org
>> Subject: [sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered - ends      10/25/2016
>> 
>> Howdy WG folks!
>> The authors of:
>> draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered
>> 
>> believe they have addressed all inflight concerns/comments, the
>> request is to WGLC this, consider it's place in the world and if
>> appropriate pass this document along to the IESG for publication.
>> 
>> The abstract for this draft is:
>> "This document proposes an update to the certificate validation
>>  procedure specified in RFC 6487 that reduces aspects of operational
>>  fragility in the management of certificates in the RPKI, while
>>  retaining essential security features."
>> 
>> Let's have a read through, consider and reply with your thoughts please,
>> this WGLC is set to expire: 10/25/2016 - October 25, 2016.
>> 
>> thanks for reading/replying/thinking!
>> -chris
>> co-chair-persona
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> sidr mailing list
>> sidr@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email