IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12: (with COMMENT)

"Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Tue, 03 January 2017 15:25 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1F0129A0D for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 07:25:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gn87ygmAmxVn for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 07:25:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kuehlewind.net (kuehlewind.net [83.169.45.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93250129A0C for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 07:25:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 20035 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2017 16:24:59 +0100
Received: from p5dec2e6d.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (HELO ?192.168.178.33?) (93.236.46.109) by kuehlewind.net with ESMTPSA (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 3 Jan 2017 16:24:59 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <9A40617C-EB4E-40FD-A8D2-65C292BAC08A@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 16:24:58 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <35FB8869-1BCE-4C3B-9546-2581EC79F868@kuehlewind.net>
References: <148336377615.21819.15119186800162780376.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <m2vatxmv83.wl-randy@psg.com> <563AAA29-82F7-4202-8A54-855CD7702595@kuehlewind.net> <m2tw9hmq76.wl-randy@psg.com> <yj9o60lx6kvm.wl%morrowc@ops-netman.net> <m2shp0nct9.wl-randy@psg.com> <9A40617C-EB4E-40FD-A8D2-65C292BAC08A@cisco.com>
To: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/tHq9wOTOhdgHlXPpkx2CWbubBSg>
Cc: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 15:25:04 -0000

Agreed. I guess you could in addition be very clear that a router that once negotiated (and/or send) BGPsec (attributes) should not be expected to always do so. This is implicitly said already, so please decide on your own if you’d like to add anymore text.

Thanks!
Mirja

> Am 03.01.2017 um 16:20 schrieb Alvaro Retana (aretana) <aretana@cisco.com>:
> 
> Hi!
>  
> I don’t think there’s anything to be done, besides the guidance already in the draft about path preference: prefer Valid paths.  If the validity state changes later, then it becomes a local policy to use or not.
>  
> Alvaro.
>  
>> On 1/2/17, 8:37 PM, "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>>  
>> it is not clear to me that this is a space where the ops doc can help
>> much.  i am open to ideas.
>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email