Re: [sidr] Interim Meeting (Apr 30, 2012) fallout/lessons/room-foo

Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> Thu, 03 May 2012 13:52 UTC

Return-Path: <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530D021F858D for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 May 2012 06:52:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.581
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.581 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.018, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3yRthBNOvbdi for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 May 2012 06:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1BC21F84DC for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 May 2012 06:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbeh20 with SMTP id eh20so2993929obb.31 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 May 2012 06:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=YBiJ4VYa7ex58yBUFDrg6jHGtY3OgynNUhtvCR+vkuM=; b=eZuiJQgJ4b461zF93ZpRMF8WRAyWJmxYTqSA7LeVrWKd+Ym1G5oVEMmGiQlohJzxW+ EnhKeza7g7WHAp1NT9bYkzQBVIO8rVcJ/7ZA4eohWsRcnqxj8u64qqX9zcnlNllNcHHa t0S3IDtKPX1qiBj7iXr4/amG+qBmTntrvwh3mwPkmLqx+UEyLM2RPc/Y87oX4kr/zIgm ST2yQHgjUh8CNJs1G8HfudZ2jJlOSTolB9sFtM9nUu4XMJvEsA6H0UA2TeB6vA02BIfF c4ixsu48B6iK2IaaLirt8yXATL6e7UOG7UQaCpHIuK/7/eRKGDRkwC8wnxelnoLEVZLt XoJg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.174.71 with SMTP id bq7mr2994998obc.29.1336053163135; Thu, 03 May 2012 06:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: christopher.morrow@gmail.com
Received: by 10.182.155.39 with HTTP; Thu, 3 May 2012 06:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m21un1pvjb.wl%randy@psg.com>
References: <4FA204C3.6090503@ops-netman.net> <m21un1pvjb.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 09:52:43 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: UfXBojcnE5qtqdnVUUovqVEMoNI
Message-ID: <CAL9jLab+OPQjmNp16scW7Va5B2e+3cqeXaUu_sKoT=fbOh2h2Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Interim Meeting (Apr 30, 2012) fallout/lessons/room-foo
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 13:52:44 -0000

On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>>   1) late start/technology fail with the webex (probably webex
>>       operations failures more than anything - my fault)
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_check
>
>>   6) microphone discipline for in-room vs external folks, often the
>>      in-room folk displayed (me too) an inability to wait their turn
>>      (jump into the conversation directly without queuing up, etc)
>
> like it or not, when there are 20 people in the room, the need for queue
> discipline is not obvious.  so it becomes more critical that remote folk
> can break in equally.
>
> i would like to hear from folk who participated remotely.  ruediger
> seemed to be able to participate as if he was in the room.  which of the
> 19 semi-functional technologies was he using?  (and he is unlikely to
> get/answer email)
>
> in $dayjob, this kind of meeting has video of the participants, which,
> imiho, aids equality.

agreed, videoconference works quite well for office things (sometimes
2-3 large rooms + 20 or so remote folks at desks)

anyways, yes more from remote people.

thanks!
-chris