[sidr] discusson on nanog of RPKI uses
"Murphy, Sandra" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com> Sat, 21 January 2012 00:02 UTC
Return-Path: <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B9621F8659 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:02:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.219
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.034, BAYES_40=-0.185, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hvFL2p7e3JbL for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:02:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from M4.sparta.com (M4.sparta.com [157.185.61.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EF6521F8644 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:02:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Beta5.sparta.com (beta5.sparta.com [157.185.63.21]) by M4.sparta.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0L02EhS001706 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:02:15 -0600
Received: from Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com ([157.185.80.107]) by Beta5.sparta.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q0L02EKZ025906 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:02:14 -0600
Received: from HERMES.columbia.ads.sparta.com ([2002:9db9:506b::9db9:506b]) by Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:02:14 -0500
From: "Murphy, Sandra" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>
To: "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: discusson on nanog of RPKI uses
Thread-Index: AQHM140+A39DDfU0hk26VRLslPbWag==
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 00:02:12 +0000
Message-ID: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F60753B6@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.185.63.118]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [sidr] discusson on nanog of RPKI uses
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 00:02:32 -0000
There's a discussion thread on the nanog mailing list that started out as "Argus: a hijacking alarm system" and moved to "Why not to use RPKI (Was Re: Argus: a hijacking alarm system)" (*) Some of the messages pointed to tools that are using the RPKI material that exists now. You might want to take a look at: http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2012-January/044127.html http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2012-January/044138.html I think this is good news about the work this working group has accomplished, so kudos to everyone. --Sandy (*)Note: the person who moved the thread to "Why not to use RPKI" was advocating FOR uses of the RPKI. The subject wording is a bit ambiguous.
- [sidr] discusson on nanog of RPKI uses Murphy, Sandra