IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] Fwd: New Version Notification fordraft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-protocol-mib-02.txt

"t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com> Tue, 01 November 2011 09:31 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 550AD21F8F3A for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 02:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.184
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.184 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.415, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wScdyeqyueQz for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 02:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.btconnect.com (c2beaomr07.btconnect.com [213.123.26.185]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B2E21F8F33 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 02:31:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from host86-163-151-98.range86-163.btcentralplus.com (HELO pc6) ([86.163.151.98]) by c2beaomr07.btconnect.com with SMTP id EZC84792; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:31:00 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <011c01cc986f$dc4c9520$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: "Bert Wijnen (IETF)" <bertietf@bwijnen.net>, sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
References: <20111031130406.9489.27728.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4EAFB103.4040407@bwijnen.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:25:43 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=Fair-1, source=Queried, refid=tid=0001.0A0B0302.4EAFBC53.0005, actions=tag
X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=7/50, refid=2.7.2:2011.11.1.84814:17:7.586, ip=86.163.151.98, rules=__HAS_MSGID, __OUTLOOK_MSGID_1, __SANE_MSGID, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __FRAUD_SUBJ_A, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, CT_TP_8859_1, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __HAS_X_PRIORITY, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI, __HAS_X_MAILER, USER_AGENT_OE, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, __ANY_URI, __URI_NO_PATH, __STOCK_PHRASE_24, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_2000_2999, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC, __OUTLOOK_MUA, RDNS_SUSP, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS
X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=c2beaomr07.btconnect.com
X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A0B020D.4EAFBC56.016C, ss=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2010-07-22 22:03:31, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=multiengine
X-Junkmail-IWF: false
Subject: Re: [sidr] Fwd: New Version Notification fordraft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-protocol-mib-02.txt
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:31:09 -0000

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bert Wijnen (IETF)" <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
To: "sidr wg list" <sidr@ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 9:42 AM

> Hi SIDR people,
>
> We have merged the two earlier MIB modules into one.
> It has undergone quite a set of changes.
> I think it would be good to review and discuss it at the
> upcoming IETF meeting.
>
> We have not yet defined the objects that extend the bgp4 MIB
> to show if a route is valid, invalid or notfound.
> That could possible also contain a set of counters.
> Anyway, that is work to be done.

Bert

That makes me wonder what you would regard as the base MIB for bgp4.  The idr WG
has been updating it for over five years, and the topic surfaces occasionally on
that list but I cannot recall anything for a year now, so what would the base
be?

(And yes, I like one I-D, one MIB module instead of two).

Tom Petch

>
> Bert
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-protocol-mib-02.txt
> Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 06:04:06 -0700
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> To: randy@psg.com
> CC: randy@psg.com, keyupate@cisco.com, michael.baer@sparta.com,
bertietf@bwijnen.net
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-protocol-mib-02.txt has been
successfully submitted by Randy Bush and posted to the IETF
> repository.
>
> Filename: draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-protocol-mib
> Revision: 02
> Title: Definitions of Managed Objects for the RPKI-Router Protocol
> Creation date: 2011-10-31
> WG ID: Individual Submission
> Number of pages: 23
>
> Abstract:
>     This document defines a portion of the Management Information Base
>     (MIB) for use with network management protocols in the Internet
>     community.  In particular, it describes objects used for monitoring
>     the RPKI Router protocol.
>
>
>
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email