IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] date/time/logistics for Jun meeting in association with nanog

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 03 May 2012 19:38 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 445C821F85FC for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 May 2012 12:38:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0t8fDQL5DFh5 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 May 2012 12:38:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [208.254.26.82]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFAF21F8531 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 May 2012 12:38:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [208.254.26.81]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F34F2403F for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 May 2012 15:38:13 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([208.254.26.82]) by localhost (ronin.smetech.net [208.254.26.81]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b5e99bJ537Nh for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 May 2012 15:38:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [10.16.123.24] (173-167-193-1-ip-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.167.193.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8150F24047 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 May 2012 15:38:09 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FA2C5C6.9030408@bbn.com>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 15:37:59 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6E482C81-2F54-4E0C-963E-A26F88B04CE8@vigilsec.com>
References: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F60F70484F@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <4FA2C5C6.9030408@bbn.com>
To: "sidr@ietf.org wg" <sidr@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Subject: Re: [sidr] date/time/logistics for Jun meeting in association with nanog
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 19:38:05 -0000

3 June is preferable for me; 6 June is acceptable.

Russ


On May 3, 2012, at 10:52 AM, Matt Lepinski wrote:

> 3 June and (the originally proposed) 6 June both work equally well for me.
> 
> On 4/27/2012 4:27 PM, Murphy, Sandra wrote:
>> Also, NANOG has just told us that they would be able to provide meeting room support, but only on Sunday 3 Jun, 0800-1200.
>> 
>> Please respond as to whether you would accept moving the interim meeting to 3 Jun.
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr


-- 
Brian Weis
Security Standards and Technology, SRTG, Cisco Systems
Telephone: +1 408 526 4796
Email: bew@cisco.com





_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email