IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] wglc for draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-11

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Sat, 14 February 2015 16:36 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C07A01A6F0E for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 08:36:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lLkbeZCNAr8G for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 08:36:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [198.180.150.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5A211A6F0D for <sidr@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 08:36:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1YMfhq-00011z-MZ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 16:36:35 +0000
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 01:36:32 +0900
Message-ID: <m2wq3klab3.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Douglas Montgomery <dougm@nist.gov>
In-Reply-To: <D104DC36.3310E%dougm@nist.gov>
References: <54DA7C98.4040604@mandelberg.org> <D103DE3D.1041C%keyupate@cisco.com> <D104DC36.3310E%dougm@nist.gov>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/wid9Xg0plmJPO6QQyKHxDNi28dc>
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>, David Mandelberg <david@mandelberg.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] wglc for draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-11
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 16:36:41 -0000

> And even if we had not decoupled those two, just because you might
> be authorized to announce 102::/16 to a peer, that is different than
> saying that you actually announced it.

point taken

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email