Re: [sidr] two stranded docuemnts - stake time

Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> Thu, 21 July 2016 16:00 UTC

Return-Path: <sandy@tislabs.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0879012D62E; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 09:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.188
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.188 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9khaG9xxVcqA; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 09:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from walnut.tislabs.com (walnut.tislabs.com [192.94.214.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 517B312D76D; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 09:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nova.tislabs.com (unknown [10.66.1.77]) by walnut.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF3BC28B0043; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:00:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by nova.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C1C71F8055; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:59:59 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E544B9DE-B248-46D1-8492-54A7E801FF46"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <yj9oinvzi8gj.wl%morrowc@ops-netman.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:59:52 -0400
Message-Id: <87E65996-2ACD-4A3A-8D20-1C7911CBBB72@tislabs.com>
References: <yj9oinvzi8gj.wl%morrowc@ops-netman.net>
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/xTW0QizL5_c4HzLKzN8tujK_TWc>
Cc: sidr-ads@ietf.org, sidr@ietf.org, sidr-chairs@ietf.org, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
Subject: Re: [sidr] two stranded docuemnts - stake time
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:00:07 -0000

> On Jul 21, 2016, at 6:36 AM, Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> We are going to officially stake:
>  1)     draft-ietf-sidr-slurm

Hasn’t had energy in a while, but not so long that I can say there’s no possibility of resurrection.  (e.g., keyroll had a two year gap in there.  But then the need was clear.)


>  2)     draft-ietf-sidr-lta-use-cases
> 
> These are not being progressed currently, and won't be in the future
> it seems. We'll do the process bits next week to remove them from
> SIDR's work queue.

I’d like to hear from the authors (we’ve heard from Randy) whether they have a possibility of continuing.

And I’d think the wg has to declare there’s no interest - if there’s a reason, and a new author volunteers…

—Sandy

> 
> -chris