Re: [sidr] Interim Meeting (Apr 30, 2012) fallout/lessons/room-foo

Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net> Fri, 04 May 2012 20:07 UTC

Return-Path: <morrowc@ops-netman.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC3821F85AA for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 May 2012 13:07:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_54=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MlvRE0g+CCUK for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 May 2012 13:07:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailserver.ops-netman.net (mailserver.ops-netman.net [IPv6:2001:470:e495:fade:5054:ff:fe79:69db]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4692721F85A3 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 May 2012 13:07:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from donkey.her.corp.google.com (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:100a:0:baac:6fff:fe92:fb7a]) (Authenticated sender: morrowc@OPS-NETMAN.NET) by mailserver.ops-netman.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E285F320306; Fri, 4 May 2012 20:07:09 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4FA436EC.6000609@ops-netman.net>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 16:07:08 -0400
From: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>
References: <4FA204C3.6090503@ops-netman.net> <B03D2D1E-A080-4185-B4E1-FE181CF3856B@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <B03D2D1E-A080-4185-B4E1-FE181CF3856B@juniper.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "sidr-ads@tools.ietf.org" <sidr-ads@tools.ietf.org>, "sidr-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <sidr-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] Interim Meeting (Apr 30, 2012) fallout/lessons/room-foo
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 20:07:11 -0000

On 05/04/2012 03:42 PM, John G. Scudder wrote:
> A few things in addition to what others have said:
> 
> On May 3, 2012, at 12:08 AM, Chris Morrow wrote:
> 
>> o shared slides prior to the meeting (no slides, no slot.
>> potentially)
> 
> We covered a fair amount of ground at the interim without using
> slides at all. Based on that, I'm not sure where this (possible)
> requirement comes from? I, for one, am not at all keen to prepare

There were several remote people who said: "Where are the slides, yo?"

I think I also translated this from 'regular meeting' in my head :( For
the interim I believe if there are slides to be presented we need those
posted to the SIDR wg page on tools.ietf before the meeting starts.

I don't think that for the interim slides (in this case) would have been
particularly helpful. In past meetings we've had success with slides
(Sharon's given a few presentations that were slide-heavy, as has Sriram).

> slide decks just for the fun of it, and I looked at lack of slides at
> the interim as a plus, not a minus. Yes, if slides are used -- and
> I'm not against it when useful/desired -- they should be distributed.
> But I can't see making them required.

yes, this was my thought process jump, oops!

> That brings me to one other point, the whiteboard. I think we should
> encourage use of a whiteboard (or easel, etc). But this implies a
> need to be able to share it with remote participants. We did the best
> we could last time, by snapping photos of the whiteboard and sending
> them out in real time, but there's gotta be a better way.

so far I've not seen a workable/useful shared whiteboard app :(
I'm also not super enamoured with using my personal flickr account :)
who knows what I may post there in the future.

> Ideally remote participants would be able to mark on the whiteboard
> too, but while the technology does exist, I don't see it really
> happening. At least, let's focus on getting the audio right first.

yes.

Thanks for your thoughts,
-chris