IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2?

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Thu, 07 April 2011 22:42 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D6E28C120 for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 15:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.586
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.586 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rYiOorNBog9i for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 15:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [147.28.0.36]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0628028C175 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 15:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rair.local.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.74 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1Q7xw6-000A2V-DR; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 22:44:22 +0000
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 15:44:21 -0700
Message-ID: <m2ipupsmuy.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Brian Weis <bew@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <55B61488-045C-44FA-90DB-83543A6209FB@cisco.com>
References: <AANLkTimq3hcdK7-f_Pa9sWJJOTzF_GBLcYu36sB3WszN@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikfn_ZRQNQx0QLV7fJa8DDeqMa=yRqWUH4krMHD@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinV88U3cF6z51eNtPeF-xKG1aWVgALd06CPq4kE@mail.gmail.com> <m2d3l6cj2l.wl%randy@psg.com> <289DB32D-D175-49DE-AA82-100407F64C23@juniper.net> <Pine.WNT.4.64.1104012156360.4612@mw-PC> <20110401210506.GA3082@juniper.net> <Pine.WNT.4.64.1104021120430.4612@mw-PC> <20110404083237.GA1860@juniper.net> <FFD0D281-AA3C-4CF2-8AF2-E1A2FE0A53A0@tcb.net> <20110404125015.GA3277@juniper.net> <BANLkTi=eZ=pQ2gJfiPBfeb4frH8Tncempw@mail.gmail.com> <m21v1i9ha8.wl%randy@psg.com> <BF88D659-1BE5-4DD2-AB24-7A113360DF37@cisco.com> <m2tyea7urr.wl%randy@psg.com> <8BE1C346-6214-4343-9E46-BFA8D96E4B6C@cisco.com> <BANLkTikTqCD4_=-Sjs7ng2qSLn3vYw5qLw@mail.gmail.com> <55B61488-045C-44FA-90DB-83543A6209FB@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2?
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 22:42:39 -0000

> Possibly the use of md5 would be more palatable to the security area
> if the protocol were Experimental rather than Standards-Track.  If the
> authors and chairs would be willing to make that change

not a chance in hell.  the vendors went out on a limb.  operators same.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email