Re: [sidr] WGLC for draft-ietf-sidr-algorithm-agility-03

Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Thu, 10 November 2011 21:48 UTC

Return-Path: <kent@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6621421F8505 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:48:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.516
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.516 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.083, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g0I7LAWZqh45 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:48:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.0.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E134B21F8507 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:48:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dommiel.bbn.com ([192.1.122.15]:41249 helo=[192.168.1.14]) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.74 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <kent@bbn.com>) id 1ROcTr-000NAc-Lp; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:48:19 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240803cae1f6afd759@[192.168.1.14]>
In-Reply-To: <4B169301-A7C5-4C1D-B470-930DB7FBDEFF@verisign.com>
References: <Pine.WNT.4.64.1110201037470.4820@SMURPHY-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F6025FEE@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <CAH1iCipuaB=niUZY2WQdMX8REDVTWGjhosxTyq1AekkUiLZ=FQ@mail.gmail.com> <p06240805cae063a02041@[128.89.89.6]> <4B169301-A7C5-4C1D-B470-930DB7FBDEFF@verisign.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:48:11 -0500
To: Eric Osterweil <eosterweil@verisign.com>
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Cc: "sidr@ietf.org list" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WGLC for draft-ietf-sidr-algorithm-agility-03
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 21:48:21 -0000

At 11:17 AM -0500 11/10/11, Eric Osterweil wrote:
>On Nov 9, 2011, at 1:42 PM, Stephen Kent wrote:
>
>>  At 1:27 AM -0500 11/8/11, Brian Dickson wrote:
>>>  ...
>>
>>>  I do not support adoption of this document in its current form.
>>>
>>>  The main reasons have to do with fundamental aspects which at a high
>>>  level have been addressed by my colleagues,
>>
>>  so, this is a Verisign critique, provided by you, Eric, and Danny?
>
>Steve,
>
>This is a ridiculous question, and the implication is a completely 
>false characterization of my involvement.  For the record: I am 
>participating as an individual only.
>
>Eric

Eric,

The question was not ridiculous, given the context and the terms that 
Brian used. Nonetheless, I accept your assertion that you are not 
colluding with our "colleagues."

Steve