Re: [Sidrops] draft-sidrops-bruijnzeels-deprecate-rsync

> On 21 Apr 2020, at 13:07, Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@nlnetlabs.nl> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> On 20 Apr 2020, at 20:54, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sidrops-bruijnzeels-deprecate-rsync/
>> 
>> quite willing to discuss this and am still willing to co-author if you
>> wish.  but i am pretty firm about not breaking the running internet.
>> 
>> to quote myself from last year
>> 
>>   great to get the draft out there.  wish it was more specific about
>>   how this is operationally accomplished.  e.g. from the discussion i
>>   was trying to have with you:
>> 
>>   0 - publishers publish rcynic and some rrdp.  rps use rcynic and some
>> 	use rrdp
>>   1 - all publishers offer both.
>>   2 - then you can ask all rps to move to rrdp and prefer it
>>   3 - you can see, at the publishers, when no rcynic requests come
>>   4 - you can turn off rcynic at the publishers
>>   5 - you can remove rcynic from the rps
>> 
>> whether we like it or not, there are a significan number of rcynic-only
>> relying parties out there.  we need to help and encourage the
>> transition.  we MAY NOT break the running internet.
> 
> I agree with your approach, now that it's really only Lacnic who still need to do work on this. They have told me *informally* that they think it can be done this year, but that was before covid. Still, the will is there and it should not be show stopper.

My apologies lacnic, I did not mean to send this to all.

Still I hope there is no harm done here. I am sure that everybody understands that engineering resources need to be managed, especially now.

> 
> Shall I try to spin a new version with these changes and send it to both of you by Thursday? Do you both want to co-author?
> 
> Thanks
> Tim
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> there 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sidrops mailing list
>> Sidrops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops