IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sidrops] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-has-no-identity-05: (with COMMENT)

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Fri, 08 April 2022 05:56 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E9A43A1F2A; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 22:56:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DkJyWaflvWyH; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 22:56:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe35.google.com (mail-vs1-xe35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 881FD3A1F2B; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 22:56:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe35.google.com with SMTP id r1so5727925vsi.12; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 22:56:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Ioicbwa3s0nWfzUXa7KMpl3YXr6pHZQ2tmaim6YLkpQ=; b=Dtx26F0B+PF2wurTryuMWN3lMGRA00O95YzrEiK9Eivqy58hy1gwEXrT/LhGo43vi4 y2tGSBhdSNxJT6kYw4lF47Htl/5FvFrhXFfmRe14Aip3FzkvWgvsbv21T0mLXTQRDPz0 2B4ibBFmDd4gAz0oYMfpiyBV8vpduqYzkwF2vwOIvsrC+YkmkmfY7F1cY/A2PiuXuwx8 7XLEiMLvoW66tksRYYSMNnJ+/bpbyG/ft/QMqabLZulsuBYvkPVJ70jt/UIG1qlrPy3y QiFND/lj3Zeb4uK6JOMmzwGYuZ8g0MpGNVUSwV0l3+Y/3DL/FGLQi6aMPT20qf3QssRb o8tg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ioicbwa3s0nWfzUXa7KMpl3YXr6pHZQ2tmaim6YLkpQ=; b=VcFT0khrwy4I0Ur6lM1n9tsrWBPFGOANvMhVTQMpVBlIaiyN8iKd0DsmYmoTAdo60T eG+Aojbs7z9eWWkIDca71+zE/linwkuj5C5lTt3yUK/VO6SpTVpfI4JsDHHQaC7L3cpt 9W9TUBP8M1/wIpYOzcT6VDrdgTVxF4MzPaNIP/0YoF+6aWIMwRY3aE7ZTCfe0OHYRee0 EA6NuGvrdnWXFQIeiRpIfiboCYrRRsbtDpvibucg8in8yymjAyEE518Wz2JFKRZ5hJ9A La3xY11pkjYmXfoLrF5/yuVl7n8cTLrTVmINtD+Xlsobqzhz/9TMj80jXdRDzVUosz0x aGlw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532g9y/By4LE9JPUoDp0oY1fwAFfRtPdsML/T4ddi5u6kt1jSglQ H+Dhw4kW8kxtYqu02Xk/ccppq8aQcpjPQzNL8P0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy1h/QDNCeWE+/Y8tD2AS1YcBcix/o1h3DtyygECvUiOcLoj7fsdwyK/zwGtn3zDyAlGSSGFs++ZEpOedxtg4c=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:1c04:0:b0:325:15d8:c0e with SMTP id c4-20020a671c04000000b0032515d80c0emr5368507vsc.79.1649397383743; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 22:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <164930737710.17649.10181082852380265521@ietfa.amsl.com> <m2o81clqsz.wl-randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2o81clqsz.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 22:56:13 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbPb3-7-2PonZeFdLYWQBDFTd8oJyts3gufMRS631PP8w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: sidrops-chairs@ietf.org, morrowc@ops-netman.net, sidrops@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-has-no-identity@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000026cab505dc1e41e2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/0f3Ae2Y_DafmNvpjbKn4BSorOmk>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-has-no-identity-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 05:56:32 -0000

On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 10:57 AM Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

> >    If it tried to do so, aside from the liability, it would end in a
> >    world of complexity with no proof of termination, as X.400 learned.
> >
> > Is there a reference describing the X.400 lesson that could be
> > included here?
>
> [...]
>
> but, i take your point.  a knowledge of history is required.  might be
> easiest to drop the ref to X.400.  whatcha think?
>
> and i suspect that non-cs folk will not get 'proof of termination'.
> hmmm.
>

That's probably sufficient.  I was just curious when I read this sentence
to read more about the history, but didn't know where to turn.  Certainly
not a blocking comment.


> >    Registries such as the Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) provide
> >    INR to real-world identity mapping through whois and similar
> >    services.  They claim to be authoritative, at least for the INRs
> >    which they allocate.
> >
> > I think "WHOIS" is properly (or at least traditionally) in all-caps.
>
> i am inclined to lean on the rfced more than seems to be the current
> fashion in the iesg.  how about
>
>    Registries such as the Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) provide
>    INR to real-world identity mapping through WHOIS, [RFC3912], and
>    similar services.  They claim to be authoritative, at least for the
>    INRs which they allocate.
>

Works for me.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email