Re: [Sidrops] WGLC for draft-ietf-sidrops-ov-egress-00.txt - ENDS 11/25/2019 (November 25 2019)

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Mon, 02 December 2019 02:01 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29F212011C; Sun, 1 Dec 2019 18:01:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ktqw_u0o9OC2; Sun, 1 Dec 2019 18:01:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72B33120052; Sun, 1 Dec 2019 18:01:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1ibb1K-0000sX-8u; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 02:01:02 +0000
Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2019 18:01:00 -0800
Message-ID: <m25ziz1o6b.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: "Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>
Cc: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, "sidrops@ietf.org" <sidrops@ietf.org>, "sidrops-chairs@ietf.org" <sidrops-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-sidrops-ov-egress@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sidrops-ov-egress@ietf.org>, Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>, "keyur@arrcus.com" <keyur@arrcus.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR09MB3386C4CB84D407F32AA90F3E84430@DM6PR09MB3386.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
References: <87tv6jbyjd.wl-morrowc@ops-netman.net> <25CB2E64-D0B5-4D5F-A59F-4864D1C340E7@psg.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.2 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/1kQFFbLRJKzTmbesJNCE4lfSFWA>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] WGLC for draft-ietf-sidrops-ov-egress-00.txt - ENDS 11/25/2019 (November 25 2019)
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 02:01:07 -0000

> In my understanding, the entire premise of the draft is that the
> operator has created ROA with the appropriate origin AS whatever the
> complex policies and exogenous data may be. Is it not?

no wonder you are surprised that it does not say that.  i kind of tried
to hint at the irrelevance when i said "their payments to ther RIR
should be current."

the purpose, as stated in the abstract, is

   For egress policy, it is important that the classification uses the
   effective origin AS of the processed route, which may specifically be
   altered by the commonly available knobs such as removing private ASs,
   confederation handling, and other modifications of the origin AS.

the document is clarification for router protocol implementors.

randy