Re: [Sidrops] request for call for Working Group adoption draft-spaghetti-sidrops-rpki-validation-update

[Nick Hilliard <[e-mail]>]

Christopher Morrow wrote on 22/04/2021 18:46:
> Not a lot of follow on this... (well, public follow up)
> 
> So, I propose this course of action:
>    1) this document serves as a 'requirement (and possible solution)' 
> that sidrops used to identify a problem
>    2) send this along as a query/question to the protocol group (IDR) 
> with a request to:
>       a) say: "go forth, this change seems ok, it's small and such"
>       b) say: "Good googley-moogley! what are you crazypants people on 
> about?? of COURSE this needs to be reviewed... please have AD-foobar 
> spin up SIDR to properly handle this!! TUT-TUT! How cloud you conceive 
> of a world other than this!!"
>        and answer back in 2wks time, one fort-night! and two farthings! 
> (or something, farthings are metric)

do we need to involve IDR?  Hard to tell really. Will they get upset if 
they aren't consulted?  (+ will they get ideas if they are?)

> provided no one screams at me about this WHILE I WRITE THE NEXT EMAIL.. 
> we can send an adoption call/etc in 2wks time OR jump back into our SIDR 
> pantsuit and get to the business of business.

sounds good.  The proposal doesn't seem to be horrible, several software 
stacks have implemented it _and_ the rpki hasn't fallen over yet, so it 
seems like so far, it's not a regression and it seems to fix something, 
so ... yay?

Nick