Re: [Sidrops] 6486 bis

<cough> I am late, but there are slides now...</cough>

again, thanks for the folk that did the hard work... I'm just making a
summary and we(chairs) are hoping to guide the landing onto the
proposed text :)

See you all tomorrow!
-chris

On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 12:35 PM Christopher Morrow
<christopher.morrow@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 9:14 AM Stephen Kent
> <stkent=40verizon.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> >
> > Martin,
> >
> > I assume the interim meeting scheduled for next week is intended to
> > resolve any outstanding issues. I plan to revise the most recent version
> > of the text I posted based on that meeting.
>
> I hope to have some slideware out before monday for review and
> preparation as well :)
> Ideally it encapsulates the current state of the document  and we can
> reach quick consensus there (and on-list)
> in order to get the text published before the 108 meeting timeslot.
>
> thanks for the folk who worked on the revised text so far, at least:
>   stkent, randy, job, martin, jayb, timb, russ, smb
>   (others I'm sure I missed along the way)
> -chris
> co-chairotorial.
>
> > Steve
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > I am curious what the plan forward is with regards to 6486-bis? We are
> > > looking into releasing a 1.0 version of Routinator soon-ish and would
> > > like to have the revised manifest validation rules included since
> > > they most definitely constitute breaking changes.
> > >
> > > While we don???t necessarily need to wait for the final RFC, it would be
> > > good to at least have a relatively stable I-D to build upon.
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Martin
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sidrops mailing list
> > Sidrops@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops