Re: [Sidrops] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-algs-rfc8208-bis-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Borchert, Oliver (Fed)" <oliver.borchert@nist.gov> Thu, 11 April 2019 21:33 UTC

Return-Path: <oliver.borchert@nist.gov>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7CF9120220; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 14:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nist.gov
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UJ0-mIY5aO3M; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 14:33:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from GCC01-DM2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm2gcc01on0701.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fd01::701]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 334AB120086; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 14:33:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nist.gov; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=dshmY8TS+whonlGPbVxGnEHqNDBDKX/ZlCt5sgafoR4=; b=CJcaMGtj3X+XWiJ3wM7DrW0YoRLjMG+QzLaBAddkTIMIPwP+BKQ5ML8ntMPklHf/FgPsEq6FmyUrBk7XrJdWNRqr+bBV8gnQiJVNk2I0hDKLnUviw84k8/tfnRMHmw8yGoH5MD2XEJT8ZkSamh2c+38Ga807mIDt9VdREvk0fXo=
Received: from SN6PR09MB3167.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (20.177.250.204) by SN6PR09MB3165.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (20.177.250.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1771.21; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 21:33:16 +0000
Received: from SN6PR09MB3167.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::694c:8a72:b9a7:5832]) by SN6PR09MB3167.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::694c:8a72:b9a7:5832%2]) with mapi id 15.20.1771.021; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 21:33:16 +0000
From: "Borchert, Oliver (Fed)" <oliver.borchert@nist.gov>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-algs-rfc8208-bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-algs-rfc8208-bis@ietf.org>, Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, "sidrops-chairs@ietf.org" <sidrops-chairs@ietf.org>, "sidrops@ietf.org" <sidrops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-algs-rfc8208-bis-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHU7+TomgBeH2NnAEacVxYvcq6yZqY3fD7A
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 21:33:16 +0000
Message-ID: <SN6PR09MB3167E2F652CF94E50958427E982F0@SN6PR09MB3167.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
References: <155493194558.22757.15388423154564497249.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <155493194558.22757.15388423154564497249.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=oliver.borchert@nist.gov;
x-originating-ip: [129.6.140.119]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: cb9ef805-8ea4-4ee1-ba70-08d6bec54f09
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600139)(711020)(4605104)(4618075)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:SN6PR09MB3165;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN6PR09MB3165:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <SN6PR09MB31658F26F26F3533DF5E13B4982F0@SN6PR09MB3165.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 00046D390F
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(346002)(396003)(366004)(39860400002)(136003)(376002)(199004)(54164003)(13464003)(189003)(14454004)(305945005)(6116002)(478600001)(3846002)(8676002)(966005)(6246003)(81156014)(53936002)(7736002)(45080400002)(81166006)(8936002)(102836004)(186003)(53546011)(71200400001)(5660300002)(76176011)(99286004)(7696005)(33656002)(97736004)(4326008)(52536014)(26005)(6506007)(74316002)(25786009)(11346002)(476003)(2906002)(486006)(6436002)(110136005)(446003)(71190400001)(86362001)(55016002)(68736007)(54906003)(316002)(106356001)(105586002)(229853002)(256004)(9686003)(6306002)(66066001)(14444005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:SN6PR09MB3165; H:SN6PR09MB3167.namprd09.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nist.gov does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: jHrOG6X1MYo/hl69sVaGuKehnvReuIHYm2Y39+elHhTj9/0APx+EwBbEvungMQR/w4d3wGx/Q2DUA6ROVdjauQKLfw45bWzfAWx9Daxwg4NjmFEHK5ZUEEfFUaNPb0TQW+oI3Bc8HyqYT9YkVOi3jPsFaTPOajIPu/Mck2Lnk9cwa/Vxve/Ym1LQh0SrJKtdFqJrWhciqgRZ9XZ/HjMH3gDZ4gRw2T1Dd8GJxKd0taFCN2U9a3XGTQLMsrQhfqXBkS2o2MFB+7duiRV8om8c/OqnHfyHSd2uUHXXuU5go4sHBcPJRMnvBWlA3w5PZ6jXRHthd0TreSbgrV9Ptemio8mvidbkP2628Ip7AP2caF85ErfOSH9ZpbUL4N9pFrBa8ne//kc+4bWdEGh0y3MkyzbNS5xXWAgFBEL7MgFLaos=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nist.gov
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: cb9ef805-8ea4-4ee1-ba70-08d6bec54f09
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 11 Apr 2019 21:33:16.2245 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 2ab5d82f-d8fa-4797-a93e-054655c61dec
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN6PR09MB3165
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/hixIftLr7BdZKBA5YSp8AkeXYcY>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-algs-rfc8208-bis-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 21:33:21 -0000

Adam,

I also addressed ...

§7:

>  To be modified to:
>
>    Algorithm   Digest          Signature       Specification
>    Suite       Algorithm       Algorithm       Pointer
>    Identifier 
>  +------------+---------------+--------------+-----------------------+
>  | 0x2-0xFA   | Unassigned    | Unassigned   |                       |
>  +------------+---------------+--------------+-----------------------+

And changed it to 

+------------+---------------+--------------+-----------------------+
| 0x02-0xFA   | Unassigned    | Unassigned   |                       |
+------------+---------------+--------------+-----------------------+


Thanks,
Oliver


-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Roach via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> 
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 5:32 PM
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-algs-rfc8208-bis@ietf.org; Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>et>; sidrops-chairs@ietf.org; morrowc@ops-netman.net; sidrops@ietf.org
Subject: Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-algs-rfc8208-bis-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Importance: High

Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-algs-rfc8208-bis-04: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://gcc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fiesg%2Fstatement%2Fdiscuss-criteria.html&amp;data=02%7C01%7Coliver.borchert%40nist.gov%7Ce3d258b2fec2468669b308d6bdfc0897%7C2ab5d82fd8fa4797a93e054655c61dec%7C1%7C0%7C636905287512890505&amp;sdata=V%2Fkt7QEPhMzX6OVeunDQh2B8kAq2yWSaqhyOaP7NS%2FE%3D&amp;reserved=0
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://gcc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-algs-rfc8208-bis%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Coliver.borchert%40nist.gov%7Ce3d258b2fec2468669b308d6bdfc0897%7C2ab5d82fd8fa4797a93e054655c61dec%7C1%7C0%7C636905287512890505&amp;sdata=EwF%2BbEoX%2BW1%2F171PkKHeeN9NckdnGEUMT9M97wdlWTg%3D&amp;reserved=0



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks to everyone who worked on this document.

This issue should be trivial to fix, but it's still a blocker.

§2.1:

>     Special-Use algorithm IDs span from 0xFA (250) to 0xFE (254).

§7:

>  In addition IANA is asked to register the following address space for
>  "Special-Use":
>
>    Algorithm   Digest          Signature       Specification
>    Suite       Algorithm       Algorithm       Pointer
>    Identifier
>  +------------+---------------+--------------+-----------------------+
>  | 0xFB-0xFE  | Special-Use   | Special-Use  | This Document         |
>  +------------+---------------+--------------+-----------------------+


The ranges here do not match ([0xFA-0xFE] != [0xFB-0xFE]). Presuming that the text in Section 2.1 is what was intended, this issue impacts all of the tables in section 7.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree with Alexey's discuss.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

§7:

>  To be modified to:
>
>    Algorithm   Digest          Signature       Specification
>    Suite       Algorithm       Algorithm       Pointer
>    Identifier
>  +------------+---------------+--------------+-----------------------+
>  | 0x2-0xFA   | Unassigned    | Unassigned   |                       |
>  +------------+---------------+--------------+-----------------------+

Nit: The prose has been updated to use "0x02" rather than "0x2". It would be nice if the IANA section matched this update.