Re: [Sidrops] publication and fetching frequency

Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> Thu, 09 April 2020 20:25 UTC

Return-Path: <sandy@tislabs.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86DE43A0DC2 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 13:25:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.233
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.233 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6fmKFUreDh-w for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 13:25:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from walnut.tislabs.com (walnut.tislabs.com [192.94.214.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 726BE3A0C9D for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 13:25:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nova.tislabs.com (unknown [10.66.1.77]) by walnut.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64B6128B003B; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 16:25:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by nova.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9E11F804E; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 16:25:03 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2d08g5vph.wl-randy@psg.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 16:25:01 -0400
Cc: Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>, SIDR Operations WG <sidrops@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D961BB50-A432-43BA-A991-A6AF9CE83E25@tislabs.com>
References: <m2d08g5vph.wl-randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/4h7AZJz8XSZGyjwKHUsWK5IHnjs>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] publication and fetching frequency
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 20:25:06 -0000

> On Apr 9, 2020, at 3:02 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> 
> in the last days, on some mailing list or another, there was discussion
> of how often CA actually published and how frequently RPs pulled.  my
> search fu is weak today.  anyone have the thread?
> 
> of course i have an opinion on the question :)
> 
> randy
> 


Is this what you were looking for?

—Sandy

thread: Re: [routing-wg] Subject: RPKI ROA Deletion: Post-mortem


> On Apr 6, 2020, at 10:02 AM, Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020, at 15:54, Danny McPherson wrote:
>> Thanks for this Job, interesting analysis.
>> 
>> Another question here: at what interval is data from a given RIR 
>> repository ingested / operationalized by a given network operator?  Or 
>> put differently, any idea how much lag today between when an RIR RPKI 
>> repository has a change until that becomes OV policy in _your routers?  
>> I'm sure this varies but not sure by how much within a given operator, 
>> or across operators.
> 
> Consumption: Some network operators fetch & validate RPKI data only once a day, some perform that action every 15 minutes.
> 
> Publication: Some CA operators publish changes every 6 hours, some publish every 15 minutes.
> 
> I agree I wouldn't expect a lot of variance within a given operator, but across operators we should expect differences. 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Job