Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28D953A0C7F
 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 May 2020 07:36:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id pxE-ndh4ctAc for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Wed, 13 May 2020 07:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4F183A0C80
 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 May 2020 07:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net)
 by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>)
 id 1jYsUM-00037b-Bg; Wed, 13 May 2020 14:36:02 +0000
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 07:36:01 -0700
Message-ID: <m2ftc3yka6.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@nlnetlabs.nl>
Cc: Stephen Kent <stkent=40verizon.net@dmarc.ietf.org>,
	sidrops@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <70BC4878-93D3-4331-A887-AF693B7CC9AA@nlnetlabs.nl>
References: <be9450ba-fe9c-465f-98a2-919772b3b32a.ref@verizon.net>
 <be9450ba-fe9c-465f-98a2-919772b3b32a@verizon.net>
 <20200512211314.4C2CD20156DBC4@minas-ithil.hactrn.net>
 <73b88326-d537-93eb-b0d0-a0a82507081c@verizon.net>
 <m2imh0x750.wl-randy@psg.com>
 <70BC4878-93D3-4331-A887-AF693B7CC9AA@nlnetlabs.nl>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0
 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/5PY_OwES4cheLs1tZT7SGPDD84g>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] rev 4 (corrected CRLDP source changes, thanks to Tim)
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>,
 <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>,
 <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 14:36:08 -0000

> In my opinion there should be a MUST include one and only one
> CRL. Then offending MFTs can be considered broken, and there is no
> defensive code needed.

you are talking to someone who thought that rsync MTI spec was
sufficient

my mother would recommend a bit of focus on defensive, not offensive,
programing.  do not na=EFvely trust the input.  assume that some QA geek
is gonna throw a fuzz test at you.

randy