IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sidrops] WG-ADOPTION: draft-borchert-sidrops-rpki-state-unverified-01 - ENDS: 2019-03-12 (mar 12)

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Thu, 28 February 2019 17:56 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE8B130EE9 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 09:56:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qoHl8bAXoGFH for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 09:56:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D526D12F1AB for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 09:56:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BC4731E2D8; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 12:55:31 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 12:55:31 -0500
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: "Montgomery, Douglas (Fed)" <dougm@nist.gov>, sidrops@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20190228175531.GB20319@pfrc.org>
References: <m2fts968ei.wl-randy@psg.com> <BD686FC4-58B7-48FC-85EC-EEC5C2F30B53@vigilsec.com> <20190227215142.GB21642@pfrc.org> <3EF81391-A613-4F10-B636-E29ABB5643DA@vigilsec.com> <7735E727-E19E-493B-ACAE-38F6A1A4BA75@nist.gov> <m2ef7s4wtx.wl-randy@psg.com> <0B6FBEFD-DF57-4613-9B66-ED4A9E8302A2@nist.gov> <m27edk4llm.wl-randy@psg.com> <0319BBE5-1991-4513-8E20-7AD72E991074@nist.gov> <m2va133l9t.wl-randy@psg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m2va133l9t.wl-randy@psg.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/5osgdOiI1FfqD87Lx_D7WX3GKKM>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] WG-ADOPTION: draft-borchert-sidrops-rpki-state-unverified-01 - ENDS: 2019-03-12 (mar 12)
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 17:56:25 -0000

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 08:55:42AM -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
> > Are you saying no one uses the RFC8097 extended community in iBGP?
> 
> not to my knowledge.  see rfc 8481

As I commented during the cloudflare RPKI event before NANOG: I tend to
notice something is getting attention and use because bugs are filed.

So, I have at least some contrary data points to your knowledge.

-- Jeff

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email