IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sidrops] [routing-wg] misconceptions about ROV

Job Snijders <job@fastly.com> Tue, 22 February 2022 11:44 UTC

Return-Path: <job@fastly.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 073FB3A0E6E for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 03:44:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fastly.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id voqshXegWDk7 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 03:43:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62b.google.com (mail-ej1-x62b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 023053A0E6A for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 03:43:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id vz16so42123316ejb.0 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 03:43:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastly.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=EjFCi/ae5pq6eP3V7fSDRGbaDCQQwlbA2oHEbJAZjws=; b=RaIRXBZyEHL7FeWwBIlWFk3DWLIyb4VmonVf2K16V8G42DoKCDXNBsAuZUVhKZKT33 L1YT2wc6jU6Aj8WoteRd6bmDrp0iZ8mlFQnrV0FsRET+HTFVe+x3NNomaIAccWBwft/N RujfhurF7mGZot/hlhGpjkumBb0cv5U+oE/10=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=EjFCi/ae5pq6eP3V7fSDRGbaDCQQwlbA2oHEbJAZjws=; b=QwRyLYaG7qPZE4yzZUbVhrcqW4uyflKLztvqvHrJIOJTsUBPryBzGj59LEj6FeFhW/ +iYxl0LPnayYMariVzfbiNQYEgHngljWHcPnnbwUxbHc6NreVaSSXxkrzSiEjXAsCtRd z+rKf8dNE9wYFl0JvJLuJIcDB4UFs6+0Da2KOcKYg1rEqTj8+WBl7v+IJhTfgzsb0MCi j96+Mb5hL92vepJGDYC//hBg69ytWEZFgv2ErYKfqRY1S8I7Sahcxebw83sd4t/7sXcV LFycCjy7rMgyEKoYtVDfcLYwZTrkldkslkiSCfIMNcA5ZmJprdSbkk5m6ZlWD5RTe7vw ZgrQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532J7ZDq9JsxuDi25Pj0h8F4AQBcgTVi9w3WB0BJ/AgaqbDlmW5R ephdPvE6OqdRhvhPOABROyYgbN+JlXRf9Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzqsmrQwIEEqsglZFu8X7YsyCdlpnhzZE5u8rOLrDQ1jwLl/piTegOfG0QvsTKJMuAv20o/ow==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:1384:b0:6cd:5c6a:eec0 with SMTP id vs4-20020a170907138400b006cd5c6aeec0mr19751329ejb.35.1645530236152; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 03:43:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from snel ([2a10:3781:276:2:16f6:d8ff:fe47:2eb7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o18sm9541089edw.102.2022.02.22.03.43.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 22 Feb 2022 03:43:55 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 12:43:54 +0100
From: Job Snijders <job@fastly.com>
To: Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@nlnetlabs.nl>
Cc: sidrops@ietf.org
Message-ID: <YhTMeqPkBEXzo0bg@snel>
References: <m2h78roqbp.wl-randy@psg.com> <7FBC2063-2404-4BF9-836E-210629C4BA63@juicybun.cn> <m28ru3ofyq.wl-randy@psg.com> <3C18BA8C-FA34-4D24-96E4-F85644089513@nlnetlabs.nl> <015C9C28-4230-40D8-A9F2-7420B726C00F@juicybun.cn> <DF148DA2-C94D-42BF-A37F-668D9B37860B@nlnetlabs.nl> <YhS/WR3czIP3jNLF@snel> <ABE3FA29-6C9D-492B-A72A-68C20176E76D@nlnetlabs.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ABE3FA29-6C9D-492B-A72A-68C20176E76D@nlnetlabs.nl>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/5s0Z-aAcQmHBOdnpsVcVvrwi8MY>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] [routing-wg] misconceptions about ROV
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 11:44:03 -0000

On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 12:38:59PM +0100, Tim Bruijnzeels wrote:
> Currently you need to accept BGPSec invalid path on any path where at
> least one ASN does NOT participate in BGPSec. Applying BGPSec path
> validation is only safe when you know that ALL ASNs on the path
> participate.

Are you perhaps confusing 'unsigned' and 'invalid' paths?

Regards,

Job

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email