Re: [Sidrops] New Version Notification for draft-ymbk-8210bis-00.txt

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Fri, 06 March 2020 21:15 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C703A0AB8 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 13:15:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iEoFsK05F1cR for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 13:15:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A866E3A0AC0 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 13:15:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1jAKJZ-0002tW-2A; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 21:15:25 +0000
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 13:15:24 -0800
Message-ID: <m21rq5jic3.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Martin Hoffmann <martin@opennetlabs.com>
Cc: SIDR Operations WG <sidrops@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200306130129.59c888c1@glaurung.nlnetlabs.nl>
References: <158274065310.22955.10729466847169070546.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <m28skpusek.wl-randy@psg.com> <20200306130129.59c888c1@glaurung.nlnetlabs.nl>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/7UpSRW47b7s8yax7nfsHjf91qRs>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] New Version Notification for draft-ymbk-8210bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 21:15:29 -0000

> ASPA in its current form includes the address family, ie., it has
> different ASPA objects for v4 and v6. This is missing from the
> proposed ASPA RTR payload PDU, but luckily there is enough zero space
> to include it.

a point to be settled between aspa and rpk-rtrv2.  do we really see
significant divergence between ipv4 and ipv6 topologies?  if so, is
this a good thing which should be supported at the cost of two tables
in the router?

thanks for raising the issue.

randy