Re: [Sidrops] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidrops-lta-use-cases-05: (with COMMENT)
Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Tue, 30 April 2019 13:36 UTC
Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47FF912001B; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 06:36:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.65
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.65 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BpNnu2xm4ONb; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 06:36:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it1-f196.google.com (mail-it1-f196.google.com [209.85.166.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2BA9120025; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 06:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it1-f196.google.com with SMTP id s3so4682107itk.1; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 06:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=D1tljOK9JCC0ANaQ8X76MbQCjuX/I7Husv/5qdRm+9w=; b=JgWterYjCfx59cNHg2e6Yj/GNmB2vj3bW+NHS5JXgPOyhKMh+P6UU9TAId+HsUFajG iWmywOkXFahKLqPJb6X69yyqMSPYybN9XYjiYwOQZ7ncUK7BlC/YC4wMiz2y1uBQe+Ds FjyQqu3IXVVtRhY5RK+JCUBFBpz+HIWzkapxZUbIHEdElsGEZ288xJXbY8MMOSnS35+9 LnDOWZrkXB9hZPNYr/43+n3KjPBdazzSWOgP4XlUfb2mWNKnj1KY1X6C60Z1b4Cfmr2y 7QuAtfTLjwAuqWKMf+KrsLv6YN/bq7opIc/Ubsjg4fdTptoG2yJPPR4CSoNr/0Pub5Zy 7b0A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUJaDVnXSSoHzoDm+w0yz+hkX9jW696MobNeX4iLFTOd91N7+HI SNrPWQvQQ0/fxFWkCQkxLyVXlIbVbEpzsQ263cc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzGK+jnVSRuABwcNLBq/zdiHoIZCDc0b5/xcG7wyYvTWoBjdIJqVy6pn0JeEXBsLhw19IOKLkMkosrUMB8CL5o=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:7dd2:: with SMTP id b201mr3935057itc.93.1556631388928; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 06:36:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <155659678989.12846.6228625087288154485.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <155659678989.12846.6228625087288154485.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 09:36:17 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJJJ8xgj=xYSG16rYrN0Vf96pJsvxP6sYAZO4A0ABEzHPA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-sidrops-lta-use-cases@ietf.org, Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, sidrops@ietf.org, sidrops-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/8nC_8B2OvlnLQzU3NnWc1zM58dc>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidrops-lta-use-cases-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 13:36:35 -0000
> ** The document seems to lack a both a reference to RFC 2119 and the > recommended RFC 2119 boilerplate, even if it appears to use RFC 2119 > keywords. > > RFC 2119 keyword, line 177: '...eds. Hence they MUST be implemented t...' > > Please consider adding the boilerplate specified in RFC 8174. Or, alternatively (and my preference), re-word that brief paragraph in the Security Considerations so that it doesn't use "MUST". I find "Hence they MUST be implemented to assure the local constraint." hard to understand anyway, so re-wording might help. Barry
- [Sidrops] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf… Adam Roach via Datatracker
- Re: [Sidrops] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-… Barry Leiba
- Re: [Sidrops] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-… Randy Bush
- Re: [Sidrops] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-… Adam Roach
- Re: [Sidrops] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-… Randy Bush