Re: [Sidrops] update to document status

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Fri, 22 November 2019 17:46 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E96B12089D for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 09:46:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0L8N7xjsgs1U for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 09:46:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48CDB120883 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 09:46:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Envelope-To: sidrops@ietf.org
Received: from cupcake.local (089-101-195156.ntlworld.ie [89.101.195.156] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id xAMHkBxO099797 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 22 Nov 2019 17:46:12 GMT (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.ibn.ie: Host 089-101-195156.ntlworld.ie [89.101.195.156] (may be forged) claimed to be cupcake.local
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>, sidrops@ietf.org
References: <20191121082436.GG53958@vurt.meerval.net> <m2eey07sz3.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Message-ID: <0bef3006-f360-afcf-6152-c6526475cbb8@foobar.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 17:46:10 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 PostboxApp/7.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <m2eey07sz3.wl-randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/8ubE0EJKvDA7eaMm0yHnNRnbyG8>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] update to document status
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 17:46:18 -0000

Randy Bush wrote on 21/11/2019 22:41:
> but seriously, why are you so exteemely vehement about this one draft?
> it's just a mild attempt at doumenting something actually in play.

because documenting bad practice doesn't make it good practice?

Nick