Re: [Sidrops] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidrops-rp-06: (with COMMENT)

Di Ma <madi@zdns.cn> Fri, 10 April 2020 06:20 UTC

Return-Path: <madi@zdns.cn>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9EE3A1831 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 23:20:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kl1RWnDo3W6t for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 23:20:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpbgeu1.qq.com (smtpbgeu1.qq.com [52.59.177.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01C2E3A182F for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 23:20:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-QQ-mid: bizesmtp18t1586499611tfq2w3df
Received: from [192.168.218.230] (unknown [202.173.9.210]) by esmtp6.qq.com (ESMTP) with id ; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 14:20:09 +0800 (CST)
X-QQ-SSF: 00400000002000N0ZI80000B0000000
X-QQ-FEAT: JtFveLzs4P9JtAYa2xZg7fSfam0cmhYM4duOBL5ID7LO7e/f1ycFW4pzp/TGb W3sxR9HvAs31Z+l8flLE2Qtvd26BfV4snm2boBhpAPJ2bSw6Wgh03jGlN0B4D2IUwuCI5F7 uZsZusdF6c85oQF4X17MCcQUhtFxam5jz3fZludbMNPltbEyGX7IusD3YHv2TiehyBHIhTv QtBHL1N6JBDyTD49nQl5t9S940qLDEefmiOmlR2lyfBRhzMGWNorLF23vnUkr2vOTCCeBmA hcrUyv9SEsewjhiSR+RrmHMjGSMsxWc/TkNgAU+jW1k+pK9Mm+ZX5DKql9nJGh1l7nKsVkW z6BoEl3UXIhsgTAYFw=
X-QQ-GoodBg: 2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Di Ma <madi@zdns.cn>
In-Reply-To: <20200409221605.GI88064@kduck.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 14:20:06 +0800
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-sidrops-rp@ietf.org, SIDROps Chairs <sidrops-chairs@ietf.org>, SIDR Operations WG <sidrops@ietf.org>, nathalie@ripe.net
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C166F403-4276-413F-9293-DA899FD13F12@zdns.cn>
References: <158641275843.11786.5802713073847135604@ietfa.amsl.com> <DA8A6766-3A36-4E3B-AD15-E05D7A1CD686@rpstir.net> <20200409221605.GI88064@kduck.mit.edu>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520
Feedback-ID: bizesmtp:zdns.cn:qybgforeign:qybgforeign5
X-QQ-Bgrelay: 1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/B2DnvRRwELoBZLm-sZ4-E3BedRs>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidrops-rp-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 06:20:23 -0000

Benjamin,

>>> 
>>> Section 3.1
>>> 
>>>  established by Section 4 of [RFC6487].  This means that all
>>>  extensions mandated by Section 4.8 of [RFC6487] must be present and
>>>  value of each extension must be within the range specified by this
>>>  RFC.  Moreover, any extension excluded by Section 4.8 of [RFC6487]
>>> 
>>> nit: s/this/that/ ("this RFC" is the thing that draft-ietf-sidrops-rp
>>> will become, in this context).
>> 
>> 
>> ACK.
>> 
>> We will use “this document” instead of “this RFC”.
> 
> It's not aquestion of "RFC" vs. "document" but rather "this" vs. "that" --
> someone reading the RFC that draft-ietf-sidrops-rp will become is reading
> "this RFC", whereas that other RFC (RFC 6487) that we're making a
> reference to is "that RFC".

Gotcha:-)

We will replace "this RFC" with "RFC 6487". 

Di