Re: [Sidrops] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidrops-rtr-keying

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Tue, 04 December 2018 17:09 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10022130F65 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 09:09:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.358
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.358 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-1.459, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X-J-HTvSQLcz for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 09:09:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com (mail-wr1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::436]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED0C3130F62 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 09:09:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id b14so3189175wru.12 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 09:09:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6TPGr3LsKsovw1xHHSuPputEDSQgkhGbFl5pUl+1W0I=; b=UBAUOwAwKHX1oPCWMetkn4N6wFuKFfJtI2XZjKh7GQcawOGU0/Enyg/gHARG2343Tc DctegJfs9urCEWXryHMD/KhP/QqiHfmpNE6m1Cs2BUTy928asyxcjc03Mezhzi1kaxCj lobTuvfWfmFpxP3gH4d7PbYy2fhgvXkYI4AaEhx/Dhe+IIo7J2oRRcybYGbla5xQ2fnh gFyUvC8ds0c4rqlUr8phoarquCi3FtsdhCfpXP1sISSRNQdc5yHI8Ohv5cRxI87GgH98 HTtvY7YWb2aZNOVrOgBXCllJvwf9OBWibNC6URb7BGWvCCc8La/y10PQ8EF11MYch6Nt wyVg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6TPGr3LsKsovw1xHHSuPputEDSQgkhGbFl5pUl+1W0I=; b=T8GPK9HZ2BfNccWEOvNhOT3Jwor1K3s0reqHR4tglnD93wxfd0FPIN7qlqREmpeST8 5PoccJfSfigj6+48jy19+HBe+aPUkE1cnMjjLssJAY/vM9o01D0z5SPw03OOd4wPpISc jIjwb3xwV8zALQEYk1Vt7XKfnTkMLSco0IvpOJGukaAKHwTZ1d2frVnkTCCfw97ErhD5 obyg+H1fuDmHIx1Ymyg77BxPjcgjpjlb+EfUn4fZziwYRqPq3b7txWtannKaOBrkxoH2 x/jH9tSUKG/RMmCv2K16Rrnxk0C/DgkbaNHuQk98AiXOb0BLPT9QoVGnh+Su21E8JERw M6WQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWYiPadycPQXTN6wRStQoH5abLYsKpH6tl9gQCpqpYTseCB6nz8v 2ENOsQmkpV9eooJYuPWSaLug4tIhCrtn1ugrxaC8sQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/WfUHX8YAzi52Iy2tQbsIBzFCVlBz0uBFGEsB+goJhJYCvP8Tm9siiu1l5xPlPlvQ3qNOy8qNdz01+yh5PlpTc=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:f848:: with SMTP id d8mr1799980wrq.178.1543943393075; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 09:09:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHw9_iK4iNk9WYAzzw-9Ya8raSfFG9Pxvim2zSwfzh2pWdruVQ@mail.gmail.com> <F2BDA519-5534-4BA6-9EBB-5F467E70B5C1@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <F2BDA519-5534-4BA6-9EBB-5F467E70B5C1@sn3rd.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 09:09:15 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iKW3zksRRTtUH0j7G5wJrRcDz7H2f+tBimLSxOwdQu0DQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Cc: draft-ietf-sidrops-rtr-keying.all@ietf.org, sidrops@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007f818d057c355512"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/BrJGM9emyTO_wXYaYbQBrs4G4CE>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidrops-rtr-keying
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 17:09:59 -0000

On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 6:51 AM Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:

>
>
> > On Nov 29, 2018, at 20:49, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
> >
> > Please let me know LOUDLY once you've had a chance to look at these, and
> I'll kick of IETF LC.
>
> A new version has been posted to address these.  I will yell in the email
> that I forward to you ;)
>

Awesome, thank you.


>
> > W
> > [0]: Once people start pointing out nits, they seem to continue (and
> yes, I get the irony :-))
>
> Yep - I am starting to rely on the RFC editor for the copy edits.  They
> usually do a way better job at tweaking things that I can.
>
>
Yup, they do a much better job than any of us -- but I figure if I see them
while reviewing, it makes their job easier (and it simply politer to them).
Also, having an easy to read document with nits addressed helps reassure
IETF LC and IESG that the document has been well reviewed.

Thanks for the update, IETF LC started,
W



> spt



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in
the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of
pants.
   ---maf