[Sidrops] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-has-no-identity-05: (with COMMENT)

[Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-has-no-identity-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-has-no-identity/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

BCP doesn't seem appropriate, but I wish there was a stronger document status we could give this.

In Section 2:

   If it tried to do so, aside from the liability, it would end in a
   world of complexity with no proof of termination, as X.400 learned.

Is there a reference describing the X.400 lesson that could be included here?

   Registries such as the Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) provide
   INR to real-world identity mapping through whois and similar
   services.  They claim to be authoritative, at least for the INRs
   which they allocate.

I think "WHOIS" is properly (or at least traditionally) in all-caps.