Re: [Sidrops] Reminder: SIDR Operations (sidrops) WG Virtual Meeting: 2020-04-28

Nathalie Trenaman <nathalie@ripe.net> Tue, 21 April 2020 07:59 UTC

Return-Path: <nathalie@ripe.net>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 161D63A07F6 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 00:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eRcV0HhLgHbr for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 00:59:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mahimahi.ripe.net (mahimahi.ripe.net [IPv6:2001:67c:2e8:11::c100:1372]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8666F3A07F5 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 00:59:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bufobufo.ripe.net ([193.0.23.13]) by mahimahi.ripe.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <nathalie@ripe.net>) id 1jQnoL-0005gK-11; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:59:17 +0200
Received: from sslvpn.ipv6.ripe.net ([2001:67c:2e8:9::c100:14e6] helo=[IPv6:2001:67c:2e8:1200::cf4]) by bufobufo.ripe.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <nathalie@ripe.net>) id 1jQnoK-0005Xl-VE; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:59:16 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Nathalie Trenaman <nathalie@ripe.net>
In-Reply-To: <FACE2962-F0C8-47DC-B6BB-87FFCB760926@nlnetlabs.nl>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:59:16 +0200
Cc: SIDR Operations WG <sidrops@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7720761E-4024-40E4-9FB7-11E003BFD7A9@ripe.net>
References: <066BFDB3-5009-4DF1-9882-E5D84E6F5380@ripe.net> <FACE2962-F0C8-47DC-B6BB-87FFCB760926@nlnetlabs.nl>
To: Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@nlnetlabs.nl>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
X-ACL-Warn: Delaying message
X-RIPE-Signature: b23882c8c47abee4cf35af21618ca92ac9572a90900ada7cf5f56c8ab72700b2
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/CGTcEt9fm2YrxaNWdkxHzUugfaY>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] Reminder: SIDR Operations (sidrops) WG Virtual Meeting: 2020-04-28
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 07:59:20 -0000

Hi Tim,


> Op 20 apr. 2020, om 14:00 heeft Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@nlnetlabs.nl> het volgende geschreven:
> 
> Hi Nathalie, all,
> 
> 
>> On 20 Apr 2020, at 09:47, Nathalie Trenaman <nathalie@ripe.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> This is a gentle reminder:
>> 
>> The SIDR Operations (sidrops) Working Group will hold
>> a virtual interim meeting on 2020-04-28 from 16:00 to 18:00 Europe/Amsterdam (14:00 to 16:00 UTC).
>> 
>> Agenda:
>> Agenda - Interim 04/2020
>> 
>> 1) CRL ? Manifest ? Hashbrowns? - guidance for chefs
>> 2) other ongoing work
>> 3) punch and pie
>> 
>> Please let us know if you wish to present. We still have plenty of time in the agenda. Please send slides to sidrops-chairs@ietf.org
> 
> I would like to add deprecating rsync to the agenda. I believe it's time to move on to RRDP, and I believe that doing so will help with a number of issues regarding agenda item #1.
> 
> In particular, RRDP allows publishing CRLs and MFTs and any other updated objects, as deltas - reducing the window for inconsistent fetches. And imperfect as it may be TLS verification in HTTPS adds a layer of defence w.r.t. MiTM attacks - provided TLS verification could become mandatory.
> 
> I wrote a (straw-man?) draft about this last year, which was intended to get discussion started:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sidrops-bruijnzeels-deprecate-rsync/
> 
> But I am more than happy to work with others on this. And hopefully ask for WG adoption and discussion. I am sure I am not the only one thinking about this :)
> 
> Tim
> 
> 
> 

Noted, will add you. 

Nathalie