Re: [Sidrops] Comments on draft-ietf-sidrops-8210bis-01

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Wed, 10 February 2021 20:52 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7652A3A14C4 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 12:52:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HVPmQaYEDGY2 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 12:52:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 010883A14C2 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 12:52:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1l9wTH-0006Lm-GP; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 20:52:23 +0000
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 12:52:22 -0800
Message-ID: <m27dnfsl15.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: "Borchert, Oliver (Fed)" <oliver.borchert@nist.gov>
Cc: Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net>, "sidrops@ietf.org" <sidrops@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <71D6F564-B484-4DF4-BBCA-36897958BF66@nist.gov>
References: <71D6F564-B484-4DF4-BBCA-36897958BF66@nist.gov>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/Cp-8ZKDnMYx12VTeiOfyVWVa3vU>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] Comments on draft-ietf-sidrops-8210bis-01
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 20:52:30 -0000

> I believe the wording in 8210-bis01 is still based upon the initial
> draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-profile-00. Though since version 01, the draft
> was updated to require 1..N providers and 8210-bis01 needs to be
> updated (see below) to reflect these changes.

alexander already dinged me on that and i have a hack.  but your
rigorous detail is much appreciated.

but it seems we are making the mistake of chasing a changing aspa
draft.  i suggest that work on the aspa aspect of 8210bis be postponed
until the aspa draft has been approved by the iesg.

chairs please note

> In Addition I noticed Section 5.1 does not contain any of the new
> Fields and the “Flags” field does not contain any information on the
> new “AFI” bit used for ASPA. There are bits and pieces in 5.12 but a
> more detailed explanation in 5.1 would be great.

sigh

randy