Re: [Sidrops] [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-has-no-identity-04
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 10 March 2022 00:49 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 015003A0596;
Wed, 9 Mar 2022 16:49:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id ga0C_la3m-eB; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 16:49:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 850A63A0163;
Wed, 9 Mar 2022 16:49:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECEBE38A0D;
Wed, 9 Mar 2022 19:58:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id hK9jcDbibPhx; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 19:58:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247])
by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867DD38A0B;
Wed, 9 Mar 2022 19:58:32 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail;
t=1646873912; bh=py/oyBDWuhOkYsoLwOw+g7O7EYjvShaWbIgwwMCbQXY=;
h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From;
b=Ur5p5L0bT6VPkTib3ilttX4JC/nMf/+h9NcYaYyvJHefzFvKgSuu26xNm0f7k5NN1
9N8xLb6aotWwK7TBo3TAH9KOUdE8keCUvfeAxrxWPrqn8rQvZin2+XYel/4duVCYPa
vvtTONqMJIGtwJ76AGX/jDE+3eMhKStzjr9ZYyseBvHEJBpVLsge1y5vQ6zIEvqEO2
Zr1Q8ahM888soXbzi1dgKakh5vyd+cFk0LNrTRsFbW2uLdahIPpbajXxagMlw4WKlN
Bwt4BqINlSpq4AjARedX+K1j8895YlUbZUxN/2Ra0f8Ku9Cq8LteGvnAz+F1kkMLhv
xTVchZgYPN5lA==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1])
by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55477559;
Wed, 9 Mar 2022 19:49:04 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
cc: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, "art\@ietf.org" <art@ietf.org>,
"sidrops\@ietf.org" <sidrops@ietf.org>,
"draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-has-no-identity.all\@ietf.org"
<draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-has-no-identity.all@ietf.org>,
"last-call\@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <8C8BA519-74D9-4BD4-952C-28002C07C329@apnic.net>
References: <164686787641.27464.13731142773840437850@ietfa.amsl.com>
<8C8BA519-74D9-4BD4-952C-28002C07C329@apnic.net>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0;
<'$9xN5Ub#
z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 19:49:04 -0500
Message-ID: <30513.1646873344@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/EdgcNrVB6FpiE_KuTsDMsMTUHOs>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] [Last-Call] Artart last call review of
draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-has-no-identity-04
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>,
<mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>,
<mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 00:49:15 -0000
Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net> wrote: > So I clearly don't understand what track this draft is supposed to be on, right > wrong. I clearly just don't understand the nature of the problem that publishing > this draft as an RFC would solve. I had the same question as you and Tim when I read the document. (My email didn't get through to sidrops... it's not using the global acceptlist I guess) -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
- [Sidrops] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-s… Tim Bray via Datatracker
- Re: [Sidrops] Artart last call review of draft-ie… Geoff Huston
- Re: [Sidrops] [Last-Call] Artart last call review… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Sidrops] [Last-Call] Artart last call review… Chris Morrow
- Re: [Sidrops] [Last-Call] Artart last call review… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Sidrops] Artart last call review of draft-ie… Randy Bush