Re: [Sidrops] Some remarks on draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-rsc-06.txt

[Theo Buehler <[e-mail]>]

Hi all.

This mail was stuck in the moderation queue for ~10 days. Most of it is
obsoleted and has been addressed by draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-rsc-07.txt

The one remaining point is this. I would still appreciate some
clarification:

> 4. FileNameAndHash with optional filename field.
> 
> The draft only says that the filename field is optional. This seems
> strange for a list of files whose hashes are supposed to be checked.
> No rationale is given. I cannot find any text that explains what an
> implementer is supposed do with a naked hash without corresponding
> filename. Example use, a permission to ignore or an instruction to
> report would all be helpful.