Re: [Sidrops] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-tree-validation-02
Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net> Tue, 07 August 2018 18:26 UTC
Return-Path: <sra@hactrn.net>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51C46130EE4; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 11:26:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L8PI5wYt5Qdm; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 11:25:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from adrilankha.hactrn.net (adrilankha.hactrn.net [IPv6:2001:418:1::19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A14D130DF0; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 11:25:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from minas-ithil.hactrn.net (c-66-30-20-66.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [66.30.20.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "nargothrond.hactrn.net", Issuer "Grunchweather Associates" (not verified)) by adrilankha.hactrn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4B57E; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 18:25:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from minas-ithil.hactrn.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by minas-ithil.hactrn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9192007166DD; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 14:25:47 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2018 14:25:46 -0400
From: Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net>
To: Linda Dunbar <Linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
Cc: tim@nlnetlabs.nl, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, IETF Discuss <ietf@ietf.org>, sidrops@ietf.org, draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-tree-validation.all@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iJ3JHcUtVSTNr5+sk2bQS_8J6EwzWFxvt-cnpBLW-Bf1A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <153332707807.18413.5304119074828612207@ietfa.amsl.com> <E2FB55BF-696D-40C2-89CC-4758FC10EE7D@nlnetlabs.nl> <CAHw9_iJ3JHcUtVSTNr5+sk2bQS_8J6EwzWFxvt-cnpBLW-Bf1A@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.1 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-Id: <20180807182547.0F9192007166DD@minas-ithil.hactrn.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/GAZlndwzl1-yaUt8P4J4rhYTT28>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-tree-validation-02
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2018 18:26:01 -0000
Speaking as another person implementing these protocols: I found this document useful as a checklist of issues to think about, along with commentary on how one implementation handled them. As it happened, I ended up doing most things slightly differently (Tim and I were each on at least our third implementations by this point, and had talked about a lot of it as we went along), but I still found it useful. I suspect that a new implementor coming in cold would also find this valuable, for more obvious reasons. If this isn't enough to make a draft worthy of publication anymore, push the IETF over and bury it, we're done.
- Re: [Sidrops] Genart last call review of draft-ie… Randy Bush
- Re: [Sidrops] Genart last call review of draft-ie… Tim Bruijnzeels
- Re: [Sidrops] Genart last call review of draft-ie… Warren Kumari
- Re: [Sidrops] Genart last call review of draft-ie… Rob Austein