IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sidrops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-has-no-identity-01.txt

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Wed, 11 August 2021 03:36 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1C6C3A0EC0 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 20:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YJceal-gXP-C for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 20:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5689B3A0EC2 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 20:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1mDf2H-0005zZ-E8; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 03:36:10 +0000
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 20:36:08 -0700
Message-ID: <m2v94ck5zr.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Ties de Kock <tdekock@ripe.net>
Cc: SIDR Operations WG <sidrops@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <8170EFA9-8832-4B7A-816D-9829790C23FA@ripe.net>
References: <162845509942.28236.7404410032742481217@ietfa.amsl.com> <m2bl671xbk.wl-randy@psg.com> <76BFDB10-2FE5-4FBD-8E16-8104CBE3D86C@ripe.net> <m25ywemmn5.wl-randy@psg.com> <8170EFA9-8832-4B7A-816D-9829790C23FA@ripe.net>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/GCGssr4c4YXCSw2gcrXsm-_yT-8>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-has-no-identity-01.txt
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 03:36:17 -0000

> I was thinking about the situation where an actor uses an RPKI object
> to lead people to believe they have legal authority to sign contracts
> concerning the resources.
> 
> RPKI does not have identity but it does not imply being an legal
> representative either? I was wondering if we needed to clarify that as
> well.

so you want something such as

    That someone can provide 'proof of possession' of the private key
    signing over a particular INR should not be taken to imply that they
    are a valid legal representative of the organization in possession
    of that INR.  They could be just an INR administrative person.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email