Re: [Sidrops] 6486bis: referenced object validation

Tony Tauber <ttauber@1-4-5.net> Mon, 04 January 2021 17:11 UTC

Return-Path: <ttauber@1-4-5.net>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D73D3A0E88 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 09:11:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.004
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.004 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=1-4-5-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KBrumMHwNGaC for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 09:11:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ej1-x630.google.com (mail-ej1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::630]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72A6D3A0E7A for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 09:11:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ej1-x630.google.com with SMTP id q22so37810179eja.2 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 09:11:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1-4-5-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Ei3grCO8NCZmqwptGbm3tj8q++KjaICg9s5BPEZq/eU=; b=Kem2mJ+PItcW5r8TJ+4csolk047uiu7ZScfTlFJpCT9NZgj2duf6TQik9uGuP02tqr XFT1MzPGyr8RhB+DkuEIuwqURfdI+Tt1tmdu59XSr3u5kBqIsd722JHwdSffBHJkD5M1 5/6PovF9WSoz5fzKNPMLdvpTKLaKSAM0frJOcHC6TXBmcr1/EP5A2Q5mP45Ib/vxo6uE /WpYuxIeqm0BW8VIsannAZP1iO2gAjmGHQ6PgvuNTkA/Qr6MMB4ZLdsC0nF8rWaR+dWt 98l1M6CYq7/qallk8pVq2/O2m41pu8BXBdQUJyTYoRQW+3xRKrnOGj/KaBqoEiNpOarv NCDA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ei3grCO8NCZmqwptGbm3tj8q++KjaICg9s5BPEZq/eU=; b=h3DBIuWSLVDKCcZtCaH9NiihAwh7nZ4WwlGRvQ0yNRAbgMQNnuzeM7a5VpS9kpSHSC mN+wrctSIwnBGhmA0wI+bFjn9wT4WbhpmycNWoV26/S0udJSUCMZCj5/r0i9bCaWb0II 5JTHgdJe7jzip3UBj0IwXyqqDfMbTrv2DSrLYZwDa4siD/GvfqFgpCkRuzC/yerCEO9O Z2Qn252SBuYTObqVS3jj4oL/4/imeP5hPcVIwmjXCRs97nkURIuK3hqIaEwqgyVWF7GH Gr1Jq8gInfuhEQdXIw0wPf6X0avWIlPKPzpmr4GnFopa5ra656FeA48r7oxr0d6tDHig eZNA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533vjnNW7dgs978o1uRINjMUcL934iaAwrjC06qgRabuD65rG+NP NK9P143PhvWXwVc29LvmXgGvjnR2cZCUJ3jtoo6nHw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzRmE0zzmLTjdvIz0JhlIIQL4naQEAskBGJR3hQ/9rZDZZV5lycLKH4IEOXCKdoZl40dyF/2rtpNDPF2G5vh2s=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3fa3:: with SMTP id hr35mr67449043ejc.71.1609780265512; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 09:11:05 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201203224213.gnb2nawujxm7a32q@benm-laptop> <20201204111651.4e865d7d@glaurung.nlnetlabs.nl> <X8oSBlR1pDhX83nH@bench.sobornost.net> <62CCDADA-E2B5-4354-82E5-995837633307@nlnetlabs.nl> <X8on7A4R63HYUnpz@bench.sobornost.net> <d518f9de-850c-ad10-49a5-1eee4c85fa6b@NLnetLabs.nl> <X8pJoTEUDwpE6iIi@bench.sobornost.net> <953B1447-1253-4EA2-A805-5DAB9CD394D6@nlnetlabs.nl> <X/KEY6w5upXoM6Pa@bench.sobornost.net>
In-Reply-To: <X/KEY6w5upXoM6Pa@bench.sobornost.net>
From: Tony Tauber <ttauber@1-4-5.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 12:10:54 -0500
Message-ID: <CAGQUKcf7H-tEFZuWh+E3UJNxiKF=jAXPcwhRNmuamNKwdMTGmw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Job Snijders <job@sobornost.net>
Cc: Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@nlnetlabs.nl>, SIDR Operations WG <sidrops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e4878c05b8162c32"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/Gz1sVqLmraWPLbG9_9eA829qwB8>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] 6486bis: referenced object validation
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 17:11:09 -0000

On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 9:58 PM Job Snijders <job@sobornost.net> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 04:58:02PM +0100, Tim Bruijnzeels wrote:
> > > The December 1st, 2020 case is definitely one I'd add to the testbed
> > > archive.
> >
> > It would be. I think this is an effort in itself. Do you have a
> > proposal in mind?
>
> At this URL http://rpkiviews.org/ i am trying to re-publish data I
> collected after having made some attempt with OpenBSD's 'rpki-client' to
> validate the RPKI data.
>
> one view:
>
>     http://www.rpkiviews.org/adrian.sobornost.net/rpkidata/2020/12/01/
>
> and a bit later I added a second instance with a different view:
>
>
> http://josephine.sobornost.net/josephine.sobornost.net/rpkidata/2021/01/01/
>


Nice work.
When you say "different view", what does that mean?
The structure of the data is different or the location in the internet
where the collection was performed from ("vantage point"?) was different?
(The latter perhaps being interesting should reachability of any TALs or
Publication Points be different.)

Tony