Re: [Sidrops] Reason for Outage report

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Thu, 27 August 2020 13:50 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C23A93A0B2C for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 06:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hvhdCGU2-vVj for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 06:50:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B6883A0AE7 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 06:50:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id CE2AAB1; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:50:14 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1598536214; bh=bP+Qpdipe6KI9m9Sl9jyqbC0+83WCokJumJSwnqfUbo=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=h5vAUsjQMsuy5TKxHd+vqZ0MjiqGpmO14zqQkYcIIQ4kFCFzlvn06fFFPHd5hDVyk 6cqqRcP6/nHQni7oQDO3WTBD3sx9z5bfU5+Crh1DycNhkSvC7daN7KbEjgxQPiUn4r zu0y9YQEPILvmNKqhPH5VFgWrwit1ttN4wMD2zSI=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC725B0; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:50:14 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:50:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Martin Hoffmann <martin@opennetlabs.com>
cc: "sidrops@ietf.org" <sidrops@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200827154045.52498a15@glaurung.nlnetlabs.nl>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2008271549140.11025@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <DE33EFAE-FBD2-478F-92A9-1FBD81CCC43F@arin.net> <727F6FBD-F73C-4F58-AE2D-0276B2A183A3@arin.net> <20200826160001.GF95612@bench.sobornost.net> <20200826202442.232829fc@grisu.home.partim.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2008271422560.11025@uplift.swm.pp.se> <20200827154045.52498a15@glaurung.nlnetlabs.nl>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/LFeev6Rse3l0o3I4ymH5D4T0xAU>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] Reason for Outage report
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 13:50:22 -0000

On Thu, 27 Aug 2020, Martin Hoffmann wrote:

> Should it be picky nonetheless and drop anything that looks vaguely
> suspicious? Would you be surprised to hear that if we indeed did that,
> out of the currently 175,330 VRPs, a mere 3,571 would be left. Even if
> we interpreted unclear RFCs in favour of implementers, we still would be
> down to 54,258 or about a third.

That's fine, let's then fix those. What's wrong with them? Has this been 
fed back to the people responsible for them?

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se