Re: [Sidrops] Alvaro Retana's Abstain on draft-ietf-sidrops-rp-06: (with COMMENT)

[Stephen Kent <[e-mail]>]

Alvaro,

>
> (1) This paragraph from §4.3 caught my eye...
>
>     If there are valid objects in a publication point that are not
>     present on a Manifest, [RFC6486] does not mandate specific RP
>     behavior with respect to such objects.  However, most RP software
>     ignores such objects and the authors of this document suggest this
>     behavior be adopted uniformly.
>
> ...because in it the authors get away from pointing at the existing RFCs to
> suggest a behavior.  That clearly should not be the job of this document.
You're right and we will delete the offending sentences. The WG has 
recently decided to try to adopt uniform procedures for dealing with the 
ambiguous areas in 6486 and this issue will be addressed there.
>
> (2) Nits:
>
> s/RPKI make use/RPKI makes use
>
> s/one of necessary/one of the necessary
>
> s/RP is required perform/RP is required to perform
>
> s/[RFC8208]and/[RFC8208] and

We will make the edits you suggest.

Thanks for your review.

Steve