IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sidrops] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-sidrops-cms-signing-time-04

Job Snijders <job@fastly.com> Fri, 09 February 2024 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <job@fastly.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 815C1C15108D for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 08:18:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fastly.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id slVPbYhpfLIR for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 08:17:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x432.google.com (mail-wr1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::432]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0E9EC151080 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 08:17:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x432.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3394bec856fso1375905f8f.0 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 Feb 2024 08:17:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastly.com; s=google; t=1707495475; x=1708100275; darn=ietf.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WJXjWQBY2qy0ne4S0rh9BQdfJV98a6mfVLncMuPWnu4=; b=mSwSpCNOVR37nzZjkpXhrRLDoUgUHtuu9nJ2YHGQoN7SXUXsTCF4M/YDAvJ2DgKaVF kWhZTOiCgwlGPs6Spk2NxV7OIy18ntz0G8GVKLZeF5UFyA2zYQ17enGLiJRmkzj/j17u +rlDktmDY1olSbC3wVhoNBe+k1cCOxRYjpMts=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1707495475; x=1708100275; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=WJXjWQBY2qy0ne4S0rh9BQdfJV98a6mfVLncMuPWnu4=; b=oXPAFXKG/be5zcbEXZx4R/FMerMbQgrXRF8gI2+JqB51XqtvkZpgMpzUd/Jkwcwajy 5pYxfsy3kgiinXe5xmnMxepN+vh70myA/cDyDRZkwEfWwlyOfxctrsxAJSZtvkjn9IXn NKoOOvrJLF8vlng6M9dET79mhsEr7ZIqBENv16k0eBK5oxgmimNO4qBdHHkG/7AB5vHl nlTTqN/AgekTLdrLyodSVB3JAXqo0Y0te0qq4ZKG9JvKXiKQBvy5IcpOlFUU7pIf6IxZ obR8quzBkZ0nMCUF3skWmCkAyClhxp0JB8lJ/jmGn8l9JQAyiCZ6YHmGP1hHUW/bGbVe m/Iw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzYnuQ43FsBZg4H9wFnFKSE05kflrc03hOavMZbFF5eGV+a1iG0 TS+pQsHd3lLsWVR/YBu7cvh+C6jPKGN9qlICg6w8iS5/LvIHdKJmHikJANWjyXCUNBhyh7LznCz 9RWY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE+GzSoKRVxuNnLlPsY2hGFZetllvb1U2I5xvGNQoOOA9VSmMqMny3ud82DaCEgJJHpGv7qIA==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:f391:0:b0:33b:4e7c:4742 with SMTP id m17-20020adff391000000b0033b4e7c4742mr1615699wro.23.1707495474638; Fri, 09 Feb 2024 08:17:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWcNTbDmdi4FYms8nFBBrMTdRr9dp05gjOe2tr1q6Pk2Dm7S7T81C0o6eRHvEdiCvMaUEj+P3MJN8qv50wJkWJiD5z2+4ffEEozj6eTKp7STA==
Received: from snel ([2a10:3781:276:3:16f6:d8ff:fe47:2eb7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f7-20020a05600c4e8700b00410709fa0d3sm1091348wmq.33.2024.02.09.08.17.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 09 Feb 2024 08:17:53 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2024 17:17:52 +0100
From: Job Snijders <job@fastly.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: Tim Bruijnzeels <tbruijnzeels@ripe.net>, IETF SIDRops <sidrops@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <ZcZQMC_LlU7KIIgq@snel>
References: <C61AE8CA-3692-43E0-ACE4-8BB0DEDB6D8B@vigilsec.com> <5467008B-80CC-4E5F-828F-B30EF76DAC88@vigilsec.com> <84542197-7A9F-4AD2-93AF-3E2BAD707F70@ripe.net> <FA823605-F5CD-4CBE-A736-6D4F96C4CF79@vigilsec.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <FA823605-F5CD-4CBE-A736-6D4F96C4CF79@vigilsec.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/OrLqu2MbO93tMYcneiNwM4-I3k0>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-sidrops-cms-signing-time-04
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2024 16:18:00 -0000

Hi Russ,

On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 11:10:37AM -0500, Russ Housley wrote:
> I see no concerns with [I-D.ietf-sidrops-prefer-rrdp].
> 
> However,  [I-D.timbru-sidrops-publication-server-bcp] is in the same
> sentence as a SHOULD statement.  Some IETF Last Call reviewers might
> expect a normative reference.  I think this can be avoided as follows:
> 
>    To avoid needless re-transfers of unchanged files in consecutive
>    rsync synchronizations, [I-D.timbru-sidrops-publication-server-bcp]
>    recommends the use of so-called 'deterministic' (normalized)
>    timestamps for files. When the content of a file is unchanged,
>    Publishers SHOULD ensure that the last modification
>    timestamp of the file remains unchanged as well.

Thanks, good suggestion.

I've updated it in the edit buffer at
https://github.com/job/draft-sidrops-cms-signing-time/commit/408e9b2ef3f1650da3367ff9ade3d56f363c64cd

Kind regards,

Job

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status